Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Does Stanley Morgan Have the Goods for a Gold Jacket?

By John Turney 
Should former New England wide receiver Stanley Morgan be enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame? That’s a question worth chewing on, and the answer isn’t as simple as a yes-or-no snap judgment. What’s undeniable, though, is that Morgan’s career demands a serious look by the voters in Canton.

The man carved out an illustrious 14-year run with the Patriots and Indianapolis Colts, piling up numbers that stack up against the best of his era -- 557 receptions, 10,716 yards, 19.2 YPC, 72 touchdowns. Those aren’t just stats; they’re a testament to a guy who was first a deep threat, then a chain-mover and a clutch performer when New England needed it most.

Compare that to some Hall of Famers from his time. He’s not just in the conversation; he’s banging on the door. Sure, the doubters might point to his lack of All-Pro nods or a thin post-season resume, but dig deeper: Morgan was a four-time Pro Bowler who played in an era stacked with elite wideouts, and he did it with a revolving door of quarterbacks.

Stanley Morgan’s career? It’s like he was the Certs of NFL receivers -- yeah, you know the classic breath mint with that old tagline, “Two, two, two mints in one.” Morgan wasn’t just a wideout; he was two receivers rolled into one, a dual-threat maestro who could burn you deep or, later in his career, grind out first downs. That’s a player who makes you sit up and wonder why his name doesn’t come up more when Canton’s calling.

Let’s rewind to the first act of Morgan’s career, from 1977-82 when he was torching secondaries as one of the most lethal deep threats the game’s ever seen. But don’t take my word for it. Paul “Dr. Z” Zimmerman, the dean of football scribes, called him out as elite. Or trust your eyes. If you caught him streaking down the sidelines at Schaefer Stadium, would’ve backed that up.

And the numbers? They scream it. Over those six years, Morgan racked up 4,869 receiving yards. Only four players -- Steve Largent, Charlie Joiner, James Lofton and Harold Carmichael -- had more. Notice a pattern? All four are in the Hall of Fame.

But here’s where Morgan separates himself. He did it with fewer catches and bigger plays. In the first half of his career, the Patriots were a running team with a play-action passing attack. The idea was to suck defenses up to play a potent run game, then throw over the top ... and Morgan was just the guy to do it.

His average of 22.5 yards per catch over that span was a full two yards better than the next guy on the list. The four Hall of Famers ahead of him? They ranged from 15.8 to 18.1 yards per catch. That’s not just a gap; it’s a chasm.

For players with 200 or more receptions through 1982, nobody -- not Bob “Bullet” Hayes, not Homer Jones, not even Paul Warfield -- could touch Morgan’s yards-per-catch mark. Three words: Best. Deep. Threat.

"Stanley Steamer does not go for anything short," wrote one reporter. "He goes for it all .. he gets down in a sprinter's stance and takes off. His favorite move is to take off at full speed and run under a Steve Grogan pass. Real intricate, huh? Don't knock it, it works."

Then, from about 1983 onward, his game evolved. The Patriots didn’t just send him on "go" routes every snap. They reinvented him, blending his afterburner speed with the savvy of a possession receiver, the kind of guy who becomes the engine of a passing attack. This was by design.

"We want Stanley to obtain those big results on a more consistent basis," said his new coach.

And Morgan delivered. He went from averaging 36 catches a season through 1982 to 45 the rest of his career in New England. By 1986, he was hauling in 80 catches for nearly 1,500 yards, proving he could be the chain-mover, the go-to target, while still keeping defenses honest deep. 

"He can get deep," one publication observed, "but he has refined his game so he can work the middle of a defense." 

Two receivers in one, folks -- a rare breed who could dominate in different roles.

When Stanley Morgan retired, he’d done more than just put up numbers; he’d carved out a legacy that demands a hard look from the Hall-of-Fame voters. Stepping into a bigger role with the Patriots, he wasn’t just running fly routes; he was carrying the weight of the passing game and piling stats that scream elite.

By the time he retired in 1990, he sat fifth all-time in receiving yards with 10,716. Let that sink in -- fifth, in an era of defensive backs who would mug you and secondaries built to shut down the pass. But he wasn’t done. He was also 14th in touchdown catches with 72 and is still tied for ninth in yards per catch (19.2) among players with 200 or more grabs.

But here’s the kicker: For receivers with 500-plus career catches, Morgan’s yards-per-catch mark was numero uno. Not second, not close -- but first. And you know what? It still is. No “prolific” pass-catcher ... not then, not now ... has ever matched his deep-ball efficiency while hauling in a high volume of passes.

That’s not just a stat; it’s a statement.

Morgan wasn’t just great. He was a revolution at wideout. Harold Jackson, who was a teammate of his when Morgan was the deep threat and his position coach in the mid-1980s when his role was expanded, once said, "As long as you put the ball in Stanley Morgan's hands, he will make something happen."

The 25th pick in the 1977 NFL draft out of the University of Tennessee, Morgan set the school record for all-purpose yards with 4,642 playing receiver, running back and wingback. His versatility and 4.4 speed made an immediate impact in the NFL. He was All-Rookie after starting all 14 games, averaging 21.1 yards per catch and 13.8 yards per punt return, and built his resume from there -- earning end-of-season awards that put him among the elite. 

Four Pro Bowl nods? Check. Second-team All-Pro in 1980, when he was torching defenses as "Mr. Deep Threat" with a league-leading 22.5 yards per catch? Check. Another second-team All-Pro in 1986, when he’d morphed into “Mr. Complete.” Check. And don’t sleep on this: The Sporting News named him first-team All-NFL in 1986.

Pro Football Weekly's personnel guru, the late Joel Buschbaum, was also aware of Morgan's game, naming him to his personal All-Pro team in 1980, writing, "Not only is Stanley Steamer the quickest and most explosive receiver in football; he's also a superb downfield blocker."

Yep, he was a blocker, too. He had to be in the run-first offense that the Patriots ran in those years. 

Then there’s the cherry on top: Morgan wasn’t just a receiver. Early in his career, he was a dynamite punt returner, averaging 10.4 yards on 92 returns. In 1979, he took one 80 yards to the house, showing he could flip a game with one burst of speed.

So far, some Halls have recognized him -- both the University of Tennessee Hall of Fame and the Tennessee Sports Hall of Fame in 2000, the New England Patriots Hall of Fame in 2007 and the South Carolina Football Hall of Fame in 2016. For good measure, the Professional Football Researchers Association named Morgan to its Hall of Very Good Class of 2021.

So, why is Morgan’s name not etched in Canton? That’s the question. The closest he's come was this year when he was a seniors' semifinalist but fell short for the Pro Football Hall-of-Fame’s Class of 2025, and that's disappointing.

With yards that outshine most Hall of Famers, All-Pro honors in two distinct phases of his career and a return game that added another layer of brilliance, Morgan’s resume isn’t just Hall-worthy; it’s a demand for a long-overdue debate. Stanley Morgan is as complete a candidate as they come, and voters do him ... and themselves ... a disservice by not acknowledging it.

14 comments:

  1. BW ...

    Thanks John ...

    Like Billy Wilson, who John also mentioned, Morgan was a receiving threat on a team known for showcasing a powerful running offense. Do voters overlook these facts? Absolutely. The Bears were always known as a physical running team but they had their own great deep threat in Ken Kavanaugh who scored TDs despite minimal touches. Harlon Hill later did the same but was felled by injuries. Once a team is noted for their running game, like the Packers and Chiefs, the receivers are more an after-thought but players like Boyd Dowler, Max McGee and Carroll Dale, along with Chiefs receivers Otis Taylor and Chris Burford, seem to have HOVG written all over them, though Taylor has a HOF case and Burford would have been in the HOVG without injuries. At least Bob Hayes, Paul Warfield and Lynn Swann made the HOF on powerful running teams. Morgan, Harold Jackson, Gary Clark, Henry Ellard, Hines Ward and Steven Smith Sr are still waiting. Should the voters need to reaccess their worthiness? Ability to block, clutch plays when defenses are drawn in? I believe so but there are many already elected. Its a bias that is real however.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. some of those you names are the sso-called 'deep threats' and KK, HH and others don't have the compiled numbers, maybe that is hte case. Of the other names Steve Smith and Ward and Morgan have best cases but Morgan is fighing it out in sr. committee ... I like it that Ward is considered because part of case is blocking ...

      Delete
    2. I gotta admit, Chris Burford is arguably the most extreme reach of any of Brian's "they oughtta be re-evaluated" obscurities......(love your passionate posts Mr. Wolf!).....posted before, Hines Ward is the most effective (and viscious) blocker I've ever seen in a wideout and his numbers are comparable to many HoFers.....after a certain DT, arguably the single most egregious oversight in not being included in the HoF

      Delete
    3. BW ...

      Burford showed what he could do in the SB against GB but missed the end of the 62 and 65 seasons with injuries. Also injured throughout 1967, his last season and refused to report to Paul Brown--again--for the Bengals in 1968. Had he stayed more healthy, would have easily made HOVG. Could have played well for the Browns had he reported when drafted ...

      Delete
    4. no way Burford is good enough. HOVG guy maybe. Morgan I even question for anything but HOVG

      Delete
    5. (half-serious tongue in cheek because I love Brian's screeds, but.....serious creds.....)
      c'.mon Mr. Wolf.....Burford? a (relatively) obscure AFL receiver and you brag about 1962 with the NY (titanic) defenses of that league in those years? .....ok, I'll play....Burford: 391 career receptions, 14/1 ypr 55 tds....I counter with the Pride of Orrsville, Jimmy Orr, number 28....400 receptions, 19.8 ypr, and 66 (glorious!) BALTIMORE Colt tds (ok, a couple for Pittsburgh before the Big Daddy trade).....as a card carrying member of the lunatic fringe of old Colt fanatics as I am, I've never considered Orr HoF material.....your riposte?

      Delete
  2. Morgan should be in. Got snubbed by sr. commitee for S. Sharpe

    ReplyDelete
  3. Morgan is in Hall of very good.
    Why isn’t Del Shofner not in the HOF?
    5 time All Pro.
    All Decade team in 1960s

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When he was a modern era candidate the voting body seemed to look at career totals and I suspect his many years of injuries hurt him and lack of ring(s). In the early 2000s WRs with shorter careers began to get consideration ... but now he's a senior and his time has probably passed, sadly. I would have liked to discuss him with old school voters.

      Delete
    2. Would Gary Myers be the one to contact? Would he be the one to present Shofner if he ever make the top 12? Myers is the New York voter if I am correct.

      Delete
    3. BW ...

      Myers is too busy worrying about Eli Manning, who will cause noise this year as well. It might be over for any 60s players, though Shofner and Patton on defense, racked up accolades.

      Morgan has his case but other deep threats were prominent as well including Wesley Walker, Issac Curtis, Wes Chandler and Mel Gray. Imagine if Gray could have had multiple 1000 seasons? Lack of more TDs hurts him though. Curtis had injuries and Chandler suffered when Fouts was out of the line-up. Injuries also affected Mike Quick who was a burner.

      What hurts Morgan is teammates in Harold Jackson and later Irving Fryar--who was truly gifted--that could cancel him out in voters minds. Had Fryar gotten his game together early in his career, would have easily made the HOF. Could return punts and still scored 88 career TDs despite a slow start. Could have been a weapon in the running game but wasnt utilized enough. I will vote him into the HOVG when he is eligible ...

      Delete
    4. Was the rumor ever fully confirmed that when he was at Nebraska, Irving Fryar dropped that TD pass in the Orange Bowl game against Miami on purpose, as part of something kind of sordid that he was involved in?

      Delete
    5. BW ...

      Conflicting stories ... some believe based on an FBI investigation--not confirmed--that he was in on point shaving, though Nebraska scored two plays later--others claim that Fryar stated that he didnt look in the ball, misjudging how quickly the DB was behind him. Its a tough call ... I felt at the time he simply didnt secure the catch with his eyes going elsewhere.

      Delete
    6. The comments on the YouTube clip (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h98_beH9V_8) seem to have a lot of specifics saying that Fryar was in on point-shaving, and definitely dropped the ball on purpose. I know those are just Internet comments, but there could be some truth behind them. I remember watching it at the time and thinking it definitely looked different than any other dropped pass I had seen, and definitely looked like he seemed to forget what his hands were supposed to do. Why exactly he dropped it on purpose we'll probably never know (I've also heard it had to do with gamblers threatening him to shave points or they would disclose some sexual aspects of his life that he wasn't comfortable disclosing, and would certainly affect his draft prospects), but I just don't think it is a debatable point that he dropped that pass completely on purpose.

      Delete