LOOKING AHEAD
By T.J. Troup
When a coach has had such a long history of success as Bill Belichick has there is an expectation that his record against each team in the league is impressive. That expectation has been met when anyone reviews Belichick against the Atlanta Falcons going back to 1976 when he was an assistant in Detroit.
Reviewing film and analyzing box scores reveals the following: Coach Bill is 11-3 against Atlanta. Usually fans want something more in depth than just one statement; ok, ready? Here goes . . . the Falcons have scored only 197 points (18 a game) in games in which Belichick was involved as either an assistant or head coach.
The first eight times Belichick as an assistant coach with either Detroit or NYG played Atlanta the games were usually low scoring, and hard fought with only one blowout (November 11, 1979).
Coach Bill had graduated from special teams coach to tight ends coach to defensive coach in those eight games, and the quarterback for the first seven games was "Peach Tree" Steve Bartkowski. Though he sure had productive & efficient games in his career, they sure did not come against either Detroit or NYG. Bartkowski's passer rating in all but one of the those seven games was 76.0 or under!
Belichick's record in those eight games was 6 wins and just 2 losses. The first loss was against the Falcons "Grits blitz" in 1977 as Atlanta linebackers Ortega & Pennywell scored defensive touchdowns in the 4th quarter to earn victory.
The second was opening day in the strike-shortened season of '82. The next two times the Falcons took on a team coached by Bill came in 1993 when he was head coach in Cleveland, and in 1998 when he was an assistant with NYJ; with a loss, and a victory.
A quick look at Belichick's record as head coach in New England shows four Patriot victories against Atlanta; thus overall Bill is 11-3. What does stand out is that the only quarterback who was both efficient and productive against Belichick was Bobby Hebert in the 17-14 Atlanta win in late November of '93 as his passer rating was 116.2. What has stood out the most though is not the passing game as documented above.....but the running game.
No running back has ever gained over 100 yards rushing in a game involving Bill Belichick on the other sideline. No doubt Matty Ice needs to have a strong game on SB Sunday, yet if somehow either Freeman or Coleman gained over 100 the Falcons would hoist Vince's Trophy. That is much easier said then done.
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Jack Youngblood: "I Retired Because I Was Fired"
LOOKING BACK
By John TurneyIt looks as though the Rams new defensive coordinator will likely, though not 100% certain, switch the Rams from a 4-3 front to a 3-4 base front, though it will be what Phillips calls a 30 Sink under and a 30 Wink over, a front which is not much different than a typical overshift and undershift in a 4-3 defense. Thus, it is a one-gap 3-4 defense.
The last time the Rams switched from a 4-3 to a 3-4 was 1983 and the type of 3-4 installed then was a two-gap style that relied on the three defensive linemen to push their man back, read and react to the play and cover two gaps, one if the plays came to them and another if the flow was away. It was a much harder scheme which is not used very much at all these days.
One of the players the 1983 switch affected the most was Jack Youngblood, then a 33-year old defensive end with 12 years experience in a 4-3 system. He played two years in the new 3-4 scheme and then, in August 1985, hung up his cleats forever. Youngblood told the media, "Dignity, integrity, respect, and pride is how I want to be remembered" adding "The clock ran down on me this year, it was time to make a decision. The only right thing to do for the team and for (Coach) John (Robinson) and Georgia was to come to a decision whether you were gonna go try and you were gonna play or you were not gonna play. To try (and then not play) was not acceptable to me. It was either play or don't play."
However, retirement wasn’t in his plan when he arrived at training camp that Summer, “I know I had two more years in me,” he’ll say to this day. But the Rams coaching staff had different ideas.
The Rams coaches wanted Jack back, alright, but only as a designated pass rusher, not as a starter. That idea of Youngblood playing only passing downs had been around since 1983 when the Rams made the switch under defensive coordinator Fritz Shurmur.
![]() |
| Fritz Shurmur. Credit: LA Rams |
Here are the technique numbering rules for Shurmur's playbook:
![]() |
| Consecutive numbering system |
![]() |
| Traditional technique numbering |
The following are screenshots of Youngblood in the 5- and 6-techniques (considered the 4- and 5-techniques by the traditional numbering systems.
So, going into the 1983 season Shurmur and head coach John Robinson didn’t know if the 245-pound Youngblood could play in the two-gap scheme. They knew he was a gamer, they knew for sure he could play in the nickel but he'd never played head up on a tackle before, so there was doubt. There was also doubt in the media who question whether an undersized defensive end could handle the rigors of a 3-4 defense being undersized and never having played it.
![]() |
| Youngblood's stance in the new 3-4 defense. Credit: AP Images |
Credit: CBS. Fair use claim for education and criticism
Youngblood ended the 1983 season playing 92% of the defensive snaps (the only times he came out were in blowouts and he came off the field to give Doug Barnett, his backup some experience) and had 10.5 sacks and was highly rated by Proscout, Inc. (13th in NFL) as a two-gap ‘tackle’ which is what they called players who aligned nose-up on an offensive tackle, like Howie Long and Youngblood that season. He ended the season with a 2-sack performance versus the Saints, one of which went for a safety and for his efforts Youngblood was named NFL Defensive Player of the Week by Pro Football Weekly.![]() |
| Credit: AP Images |
In 1984 Youngblood was even better (ranked 12th in NFL by Joel Buchsbaum of Pro Fooball Weekly) as he bulked up to 255 pounds ("I ate everything in sight and hit the heavy weights more" says Youngblood) and was voted Second-team All-NFC and a first alternate to the Pro Bowl and was the NFL Defensive Player of the Week versus the Giants when he had 2 sacks and drew 3 holding penalties. New York Giant tackle Karl Nelson, in his biography Life on the Line wrote, "I had a really awful day against Jack Youngblood, their 14-year defensive end. That was the worst game of my career. Youngblood had three sacks and drew three more holding calls. He beat me mentally and then beat me physically."
![]() |
| Credit: LA Rams |
Credit: CBS. Fair use claim for education and criticism
He also was the Football News Defensive Player of the Week in Week 9 after a 3-sack, 3 penalty-drawn game versus the Cardinals, a game which he also blocked a potential game-tying FG to preserve the win for the Rams. He also hit Cardinal quarterback Neil Lomax numerous times. His defensive line coach Marv Goux said about that performance, "It was the finest performance I have ever seen by an individual player.”
Additionally, PFJ research shows that in those two seasons, on passing downs, Youngblood was double-teamed 41% (including playoffs) of the time and drew 52 penalties on opposing tackles, guards, and tight ends (including playoffs) in 34 games. In 1983, in addition to his 10.5 sacks he had 21 quarterback knockdowns, 24 quarterback hits on top of that and 46 “hurries”. In 1984 the numbers were 15 knockdowns, 20 hits and 46 hurries on top of his 9.5 sacks.
It should be noted that none of the total pressures came when Youngblood was unblocked. These days you will see players get sacks or hurries when there is a blown assignment and they run free to the quarterback. It just didn't happen with Youngblood like it does not or even did in the early days of the rushbackers (blitzing 3-4 linebackers), from say 1980-84 or so. In all the plays we saw in 1983 and 1984 Youngblood always drew at least one blocker ad as pointed out, often more.
This clip is an example of the double-teams Youngblood faced. Youngblood is at the top of the screen and is met by the Giants tight end, then is blocked by the Giant right tackle and the Giant right guard moves to help the right tackle.
Credit: CBS, fair use for education and criticism
However, late in the 1984 season, versus the Buccaneers, he blew out his back. He tried to play through it but he really was not effective late in 1984. He even missed his first game ever versus the Oilers. He could have played to continue the streak but told the papers, “Damn the record. The record has no meaning whatsoever. I want to play and help the team get to the playoffs."
![]() |
| Coaching up defensive line in the only game he missed, 1984 vs. the Oilers |
![]() |
| Youngblood stretching his back in 1984 finale versus 49ers. Credit: AP Images |
The Rams allowed Youngblood to miss the first couple of weeks of training camp to work out on his own to get himself in game shape telling him he didn’t need to go through the reps and rigors of camp.
He was told to report in late August 1985. When he arrived he was met with the news he’d lost his starting job. Robinson was quoted as saying, “We’re just not going to give back a jersey and have his job back. He’s got to prove he belongs”.
![]() |
| John Robinson. Credit: LA Rams |
Youngblood responded by asking Robinson, “When did I lose my job?”. Robinson didn’t answer directly but stated he and Shurmur felt this was the role that would be most effective for him and it would help the team, Youngblood recalls.
Robinson explained that, “We think by keeping you fresh for the pass rush, you’ll be more effective and be able to go all-out in those situations”. Youngblood was incensed and asked, “When did I ever not go all-out on every play? I train for that, I do all that extra conditioning for that, to be able to go 12-15 plays in a row”.
In fact, Saints right tackle Stan Brock told the New Orleans Times Picayune “I like playing against the best and Youngblood is it. He’s a 100 percenter. You know he is coming all the time.” Marv Goux said, "I’ve never seen a man compete as hard as he does on every down. And I’ve seen a few.” So it is understandable that Youngblood was offended by Robinson's explanation for the diminished proposed role.
In an interview for NFL Films, he said “Here’s a guy who works out for six days, almost ritualistically, to get ready for Sunday. For two years I have been pointing to him and saying ‘That’s how you do it".
On Youngblood's retirement day Robinson told the Los Angeles Times, “All of us assume greatness is a gift. But anyone who’s been around greatness on a daily basis knows that’s not true. Jack worked harder to be great in the brief time I’ve been around than any I’ve ever seen.”
However, to Youngblood, it was clear this was a decision that had already been made and there was nothing he could do to change Robinson's mind. But, Youngblood then asked directly, “Now that I am back (in camp) can I win the job back?“ Well”, Robinson replied, “Well, no this is the direction we are going to take as an organization.”
“I was floored.” says Youngblood, “it (the designated rush plan) was never told to me that whole off-season or during the time I missed in camp”, adding further that “Merlin (Olsen) and Deacon (Jones) taught me to play from whistle to whistle. If you couldn’t do that, you were not any good to the team. It was the professional pride and professional ethic I believed in.”
“What I did in '83 and '84 didn’t seem to matter, I was out”. "I was told 'Play on third downs or don’t play at all' and I chose to retire rather than be a shell of what I was. I felt that would cheat myself and my fans.”
Youngblood says would have been accepting of the situation if he’d been beaten out by a better, younger player. “That’s part of the game, a young ‘un comes in and chases you out of a job. But, nothing against Doogie (Doug Reed) but he wasn’t ready to beat me out. I didn’t spend hours and hours in the weight room to be the second strongest defensive lineman on the team, I did it to be the strongest and most in shape defensive lineman on the squad”. And in the pass rush, some of our guys couldn’t get out of their own way.”
![]() |
| Rams defensive line coach Marv Gouz. Credit: LA Rams |
![]() |
| Credit: Spokeo |
"Do what?” I'd say.
He’d say “You cannot let that tackle go, he got to a linebacker.”
"I told him ‘I made the play’".
"In our scheme, we don’t let that tackle go. You’ve got to knock him back.”
“Marv, I made the play, I can control those gaps without knocking him back.”
Marv would say, “You really have to knock that tackle back.”
And getting more frustrated I’d tell him, “No, you REALLY don’t.” Once, in the film room after a Monday night game, I’d beaten a tackle and tripped up Dorsett for a loss. I got the stink eye from Marv because I looped behind the blockers and made the play."
Credit: ABC. Fair use claim for education and criticism
“To me, their scheme was not possible," Youngblood states.Here are the defensive formations for the "Ram" and "Under" that were used the most. They also had an "Even" and a "Flop" and "Ram Flop" but those were not used quite as often.
Here are the coaching points for Youngblood's position, which was tackle, a 5- or 6-technique.
As the playbook examples show, there seemed to be an option for this angle approach, but Youngblood stated that in film sessions he'd get "chewed on" for doing it and that Goux and Shurmur preferred the 5-technique and the "knock him back" approach that Youngblood insists is impossible to do and be truly effective.
The Rams defensive statistics bear that out, they were excellent at stopping the run, but were 21st in sacking the quarterback in 1983-84 with 76 sacks and Youngblood has 20 of those or 26% of the total.
“John and Fritz", Youngblood continues, "wanted to stop the run and take away deep passes and force teams to make 10-12 plays without making an error (fumble, interceptions) and when they didn’t they’d score because we couldn’t get good pressure on them. That was because we had three linemen trying to “push” back 300-pound offensive linemen. Their scheme worked well against some teams, but if the opponent had an efficient passing game, like the 49ers or Redskins, it was difficult to rush them and dictate to them, they usually could dictate to us."
![]() |
| Credit: Spokeo |
![]() |
| Carrol Rosenbloom, Rams owner 1972-79 Credit: Spokeo |
"As it turned out I now know why. The Rams and Shaw never let me develop into the administration structure as Carroll and I had discussed. I was put in charge of some corporate sales, did Rams radio, but my goal was to be someone who made decisions as to the team, to have a hand in running a franchise, similar to what Ozzie (Newsome) is doing in Baltimore.
"For five or six years I'd wait my turn, wait for John (Shaw) to involve me more. But it just didn't happen. It was beyond frustrating. When I'd see him in his office he'd be watching this contraption, I suppose a forerunner to an Internet modem, that would let him see the price of foreign currencies in real time. He'd want to see what the Deutsche Mark or Franc or Pound was doing. I'd just shake my head and wonder what was going on in terms of the football team.
![]() |
| Former Rams executive John Shaw. Credit: St. Louis Rams |
Youngblood was in the Administration for the Sacramento Surge in the WLAF and the Sacramento Gold Miners of the CFL before moving to the Arena League's Orlando Predators where he was in charge of football operations.
"I was asked recently by someone in the Rams front office 'Why aren't you in the NFL, why didn't you stay with the Rams when you retired'. I looked at him and told the truth." Youngblood shared. "I got screwed". And he retired because . . . "I retired because I was fired".
Youngblood doesn't think the current 4-3 to 3-4 switch the Rams will make will affect players like Aaron Donald and Robert Quinn because they won't have to two-gap against huge offensive linemen, "But, they may not be doing those young men any favors for the career, either".
"In a 4-3 defense there is a certain mystique, a quality known and felt among those four men, that they have a job to do, which is pressure the quarterback and when you move to a 3-4, the emphasis of the pass rusher often relies on scheming rather than those four to get pressure.
"Quinn, if he moves to linebacker or rushbacker, whatever they call it, will sometimes have to cover and they will send a replacement rusher to cover that. And to me, that takes away the mystique, the esprit de corps, or Menschheit, the honor and character of the four of us. And, remember, if Quinn moves he will be part of the linebacker meetings and film sessions, he won't be part of the line, like he would be with a 40 scheme.
"But, Wade (Phillips) is a super bright guy, and I loved his father. Before or after a ball game or at an appearance, Bum would love to talk football or horses, he just loved to talk. And he was a helluva football coach.
"Wade is the same way as his daddy, he'll do a great job, The one thing I hope is that he adapts those ball players into a scheme that will win and will give these young 'uns a chance to etch their names in Rams history by being a dominant front four or defense."
Monday, January 23, 2017
Football News' Man of the Year Awards
THINGS YOU CAN NEVER LAY YOUR HANDS ON
Complete Lists
By John Turney
In the 1970s the publication Football News chose a "Man of the Year" to represent the football person who was most effective that season. It was more akin to an Executive/Owner of the Year-type award since it was based on effectiveness in football decisions that led to on-the-field success, but there were exceptions, with the first one going to ABC's Roone Arledge and the 1977 award went to Pete Rozelle.Here is the cover of the issue that named Art Rooney the 1978 Man of the Year.
The 1978 Award was the final one that Football News gave. Here is the complete list:
1969 - Roone Arledge, ACB-TV
1970 - Jim Finks, Minnesota Vikings
1971 - Joe Robbie, Miami Dolphins
1972 - Dan Devine, Green Bay Packers
1973 - Ralph Wilson, Buffalo Bills
1974 - Don Canham, University of Michigan Athletic Director
1975 - Joe Thomas, Baltimore Colts
1976 - Chuck Fairbanks, New England Patriots
1977 - Pete Rozelle, National Football League Commissioner
1978 - Art Rooney, Pittsburgh Steelers
Thursday, January 19, 2017
What It Means: Rams Hire Wade Phillips to be Defensive Coordinator
LOOKING AHEAD
By John Turney
The Rams officially hired Wade Phillips to run their defense. Among some Rams fans there are questions of what he will do to a defense that was drafted and coached to be a 4-3 defense and Phillips has used a 3-4 defense most of his career, the only exception was when he ran the Eagles defense under Buddy Ryan in the late-1980s when he ran Ryan's 4-3 defense with its 46 iteration.
The last time the Rams moved from a 4-3 scheme to a 3-4 scheme was in 1983 when then-defensive coordinator Fritz Shurmur installed a two-gap 3-4 defense. The decision was made by new head coach John Robinson to go with the 3-4 because he and Shurmur felt that there were more good young linebackers than good young defensive linemen on the squad. So, they shipped of 4-3 defensive tackles Mike Fanning and Cody Jones and traded for Gary Jeter a 3-4 defensive end.
The transition worked well in stopping the run as the Rams allowed an average of 3.61 yards a carry from 1983-86, the first four years in the system, and best in the NFL in that span. However, they were 14th in the NFL in sacking the quarterback in that same time frame.
THAT WAS THEN
Shurmur's alignments were listed in consecutive numbers, most commonly used in college, but some teams adopt this. It means the nose is a 0-technique and the defensive ends (called tackles in Shurmur's scheme) are head up in a 5-techmique.
Phillips uses the classic numbering system for defensive line techniques. So, head-up on a tackle is a 4-technique (a 5-technique in the consecutive system) and outside shoulder of a tackle is a 5-technqiue (a 6-tech in consecutive system). The term "shade" is used for either side of the center whereas the 0 strong or 0 weak are used in the consecutive system.
This is the base defense in the Phillips system that he stated in the above video he doesn't use anymore. As you can see it's similar to the Shurmur "Ram" defense. The ends (called tackles in Shurmur's system) are head-up as is the nose. Neither of the inside linebackers (Mike and Mo) are covered up, meaning the do, in this alignment, have to take on a guard if need be and flow to the ball.
This is what will be used in Los Angeles. The end here is a 3-technique and has one gap to control. The nose is in a shade alignment and the weak end or open end in a 5-technique, all one-gap assignments since this is a 3-4 one-gap system when aligned this way. It is no different that a 4-3 over-shifted defense.
This is essentially the mirror of Sam Sink. Again, there is a shade, a 3-tech and a 5-tech, same as a 4-3. One of the OLBers (Sam or Will) acts as a defensive end for all intents and purposes. Again, it is no different than a 4-3 under-shifted defense with the exception of who may or may not have their hand in the dirt in 3-point stance.
What Phillips can and will likely do is switch Aaron Donald from side to side depending if it's a Sink or Wink and always play the 3-technque. Michael Brockers can stay as a shade technique, which he has been playing since 2014. Robert Quinn does not have to stand up, he can play with his hand in the dirt and play the Will position. Alec Ogletree will remain the Mike and Mark Barron can play the Mo backer, which Phillips says is in the above video more of the "coverage linebacker". The 5-technqiue can be handled by Ethan Westbrooks or William Hayes and even Brockers at times if they choose to put Cam Thomas as a shade to spell Brockers.
What Ram fans may be concerned with is who will play the Sam backer spot. In Denver it's Von Miller. The Raiders, who run a similar scheme, use Khalil Mack. The Rams don't have that kind of player on the roster. They will likely draft someone to play that position and/or sign a Chandler Jones or a Nick Perry or a Melvin Ingram, all of whom were double-digit sackers and all UFAs this off-season.
In an era where almost all offensive and defensive schemes are hybrids, borrowing from other schemes and melded together the 3-4 one gap won't hurt what the Rams vaunted defensive line can do. There may be questions here and there as to whether Quinn, when called upon, can cover, which he will have to do a little bit to mix up games and stunts and blitzes that are needed in trying to confuse NFL offenses, but by and large the only questions would be how they list the players. That is if Donald will remain a "tackle" on paper or called an end, which the playbooks calls for. And if Quinn will be listed as an end or a linebacker.
By John Turney
![]() |
| Will Wink (Under) Credit: NFLReplay |
![]() |
| Sam Sink (Over) Credit: NFL Replay |
The last time the Rams moved from a 4-3 scheme to a 3-4 scheme was in 1983 when then-defensive coordinator Fritz Shurmur installed a two-gap 3-4 defense. The decision was made by new head coach John Robinson to go with the 3-4 because he and Shurmur felt that there were more good young linebackers than good young defensive linemen on the squad. So, they shipped of 4-3 defensive tackles Mike Fanning and Cody Jones and traded for Gary Jeter a 3-4 defensive end.
The transition worked well in stopping the run as the Rams allowed an average of 3.61 yards a carry from 1983-86, the first four years in the system, and best in the NFL in that span. However, they were 14th in the NFL in sacking the quarterback in that same time frame.
THAT WAS THEN
Shurmur's alignments were listed in consecutive numbers, most commonly used in college, but some teams adopt this. It means the nose is a 0-technique and the defensive ends (called tackles in Shurmur's scheme) are head up in a 5-techmique.
The most-used base call was "Ram". There would be times that some pressure would be taken off the defensive linemen, who had to two-gap in Ram by calling a slant, so the call may be Ram-slant-3, meaning cover-3. Usually, though the tackles (Jack Youngblood and Reggie Doss) and the nose (usally Greg Meisner or Charles DeJurnett) had to read-and-react. Youngblood and Doss were required to knock the tackle back and if the flow was to them they took the outside gap and if the play was away they had the inside gap.
The Rams also ran "Under" front quite a lot. They had other fronts we won't show like "Even", "Flop", and "Ram Flop" and "Eagle". But they just were not employed as much as Under and Ram. Here is a look at the Under.
These are a few of the techniques for the tackles, the 5 and 6 techniques. An experienced player, like Youngblood, was given some leeway to align in 6-technique but he was still required to knock the offensive tackle back and read the play, though Youngblood will tell you Shurmur and defensive line coach Marv Goux preferred the head-up 5-technique for the tackles.
THIS IS NOW
Wade Phillips's defense is not like that, at least not anymore, Phillips insists that he adjusts his defense based on the skills of his players. With Aaron Donald, he will still play 3-technique, the same as he did in Gregg Williams's 4-3. He won't be required to two-gap, for example. He'll just have one gap to control.
This is the base defense in the Phillips system that he stated in the above video he doesn't use anymore. As you can see it's similar to the Shurmur "Ram" defense. The ends (called tackles in Shurmur's system) are head-up as is the nose. Neither of the inside linebackers (Mike and Mo) are covered up, meaning the do, in this alignment, have to take on a guard if need be and flow to the ball.
This is what will be used in Los Angeles. The end here is a 3-technique and has one gap to control. The nose is in a shade alignment and the weak end or open end in a 5-technique, all one-gap assignments since this is a 3-4 one-gap system when aligned this way. It is no different that a 4-3 over-shifted defense.
This is essentially the mirror of Sam Sink. Again, there is a shade, a 3-tech and a 5-tech, same as a 4-3. One of the OLBers (Sam or Will) acts as a defensive end for all intents and purposes. Again, it is no different than a 4-3 under-shifted defense with the exception of who may or may not have their hand in the dirt in 3-point stance.

What Phillips can and will likely do is switch Aaron Donald from side to side depending if it's a Sink or Wink and always play the 3-technque. Michael Brockers can stay as a shade technique, which he has been playing since 2014. Robert Quinn does not have to stand up, he can play with his hand in the dirt and play the Will position. Alec Ogletree will remain the Mike and Mark Barron can play the Mo backer, which Phillips says is in the above video more of the "coverage linebacker". The 5-technqiue can be handled by Ethan Westbrooks or William Hayes and even Brockers at times if they choose to put Cam Thomas as a shade to spell Brockers.
What Ram fans may be concerned with is who will play the Sam backer spot. In Denver it's Von Miller. The Raiders, who run a similar scheme, use Khalil Mack. The Rams don't have that kind of player on the roster. They will likely draft someone to play that position and/or sign a Chandler Jones or a Nick Perry or a Melvin Ingram, all of whom were double-digit sackers and all UFAs this off-season.
In an era where almost all offensive and defensive schemes are hybrids, borrowing from other schemes and melded together the 3-4 one gap won't hurt what the Rams vaunted defensive line can do. There may be questions here and there as to whether Quinn, when called upon, can cover, which he will have to do a little bit to mix up games and stunts and blitzes that are needed in trying to confuse NFL offenses, but by and large the only questions would be how they list the players. That is if Donald will remain a "tackle" on paper or called an end, which the playbooks calls for. And if Quinn will be listed as an end or a linebacker.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















































