Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Dave Osborn Wears Two Jerseys in Same Game

 By John Turney 

A while back, we posted about the Rams running back Les Josephson wearing two different jersey numbers in the same 1967 game in Dallas. He began the game with his usual number -- 34 -- and finished wearing number 35 because his jersey was torn and beyond repair and the Rams didn't have a spare with his number on it.

In 1969, in a game against the Colts, the Vikings running back Dave Osborn began the game in number 41 and also wore number 42. 


Osborn catching a touchdown pass in uniform number 41
Later, in the second half, Osborn donned number 42. presumably for the same reason as Josephson—some kind of tear. 


Osborn an the receiving end of a lateral from Kapp
The Vikings runner gained just 7 yards on 6  carries that day. The lateral accounted for 3 yards in his rushing total so other than that he carried the ball six times for 4 yards.

However, he caught 6 passes for 80 yards and the initial touchdown of the game helping in the 52-14 rout of the defending NFL champions—although the Colts lost16-7 to the New York Jets in Super Bowl III. 

Kapp, in addition to his record-tying 7 TD passes, threw for 449 yards. 

If you know of other instances of this happening let us know in the comments section.

Bobby Layne Booklist

LOOKING BACK: Booklist
By Chris Willis, NFL Films
“He never lost a game in his life. Once in a while time ran out on him-“ said Doak Walker, former Detroit Lions teammate and close friend.

On this day (Dec. 19th) in 1926 Bobby Layne was born in Santa Anna, Texas. Layne played 15 seasons in the NFL for four different teams- Chicago Bears (1948); New York Bulldogs (1949); Detroit Lions (1950-1958) and the Pittsburgh Steelers (1958-1962). He threw for 26,768 yards, 196 touchdowns and won 3 NFL Championships with the Lions in 1952-1953 and 1957. He was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1967.
Always on Sunday
Always on Sunday, published in 1962
Always on Sunday was published in 1962 by Prentice-Hall. The story of Bobby Layne was told by the future Hall of Fame quarterback to local Pittsburgh sportswriter Bob Drum. Layne explained how the book was written on the back cover. In this short, 143-page book, Layne goes over certain topics in pro football and his career- in 13 separate chapters.
  1. The worst team in professional football
  2. The truth about those headlines
  3. Joe Schmidt- the peerless linebacker
  4. The defense
  5. A game of specialist
  6. Playing quarterback
  7. Rating the great quarterbacks
  8. Some characters in pro football
  9. My greatest game
  10. Injuries will kill a team
  11. Coaching
  12. I come to the Steelers
  13. A team’s resurgence

Back cover of Always on Sunday (1962)
In chapter 7 he says Sammy Baugh “was the greatest of all-time.” He also talks about Norm Van Brocklin (“who could throw the long pass better than anyone”), Johnny Unitas and Charlie Conerly.

The chapter on him joining the Pittsburgh Steelers is very insightful.
Heart of a Lion: The Wild and Wolly Life of Bobby Layne
Heart of a Lion, published in 1991
Heart of a Lion: The Wild and Woolly Life of Bobby Layne was published in 1991 by Taylor Publishing Company. Written by veteran Dallas Morning News columnist Bob St. John, Heart of Lion is a very well-written, entertaining biography on Layne. 207 pages in length and written five years after Layne has passed away (1986), this biography brings Layne to life- all of his glories and faults.

It also includes a Forward by George Plimpton.
Bobby Layne
Both books are highly recommended on Bobby Layne’s birthday!

Monday, December 18, 2017

Ratings Bonanza Helps Panthers Past Packers

By Eric Goska
Ray (Scooter) McLean was the coach the last time the Packers’ defense finished last in defensive passer rating.
(photo courtesy of Lee Lefebvre)

The Green Bay Packers of 2017 have something in common with the winless Lions of 2008.

Neither team will ever be associated with great pass defense.

Sunday, the Carolina Panthers became the latest to attack the Packers through the air. Cam Newton unleashed four touchdown passes as the Panthers strafed Green Bay 31-24 at Bank of America Stadium.

Newton’s numbers – aside from his four TD passes—don’t look particularly imposing. The jumbo-sized quarterback completed 20 of 31 passes for 242 yards and no interceptions.

What Newton may have lacked in quantity (mega yards) he made up for in quality (high rating). The seven-year veteran turned in a passer rating of 128.0, a mark that has earned a victory for 29 of the 32 individuals who have hit or exceeded it this season (minimum 20 attempts).

As efficient as he was, Newton removed some of the guesswork for Green Bay. He completed passes to just five receivers. Tight end Greg Olsen (9 catches) and running back Christian McCaffrey (6) accounted for all but five of the Panthers’ completions.

But even knowing Newton’s preferences didn’t help the Packers much. On passes directed to Olsen or McCaffrey, Newton was 15 of 19 for 189 yards and two scores (143.2 rating).

True, the Packers are banged up. Defensive backs Kentrell Brice (ankle), Quinten Rollins (Achilles) and Kevin King (shoulder) are on injured reserve. Cornerback Davon House (back) did not play against the Panthers and linebacker Nick Perry (ankle) left early and did not return.

But this high flying aerial circus didn’t start with Newton. It got underway in Week 2 and it might not end until records have been broken.

The Falcons’ Matt Ryan (108 rating) was first to exceed 100 against Green Bay. He was followed by Andy Dalton (124.1), Dak Prescott (105.2), Matthew Stafford (132.4), Ben Roethlisberger (106.8) and Jameis Winston (112.8).

Throw in Newton and that’s seven who have topped 100. That ties the Packers’ single-season record set in 2016, and two games remain to be played.

Ryan and the other six have all helped to push Green Bay’s defensive passer rating for the season above 100. As with a fever, anything in triple digits is cause for concern.

Prior to this season, 24 teams wound up with defensive passer ratings of 100 or more for a season. All 24 missed the playoffs and only one – the 2016 Lions (9-7) – finished with a winning record.

The 0-16 Lions of nine years ago are prominent on that list. Their rating of 110.9 is second worst in NFL history behind the 116.2 of the 2015 Saints.

This season, four clubs are above the century mark: Cleveland (102.7), Oakland (101.7), Green Bay (100.5) and the Giants (100.3). The Browns (0-14), Raiders (6-8) and New York (2-12) all have losing records.

Being in that foursome, the Packers face the very real possibility of finishing last in defensive passer rating. If they do bottom out, it will be the first time they’ve done so since 1958.

That year, Green Bay allowed opponents a rating of 86.1, nearly two points higher than the second-to-last Redskins (84.3). The team (1-10-1) had the worst record in the league as well.

That rating under coach Ray (Scooter) McLean is not the poorest in franchise history. That distinction belongs to the 2004 team (99.1).

In 2004, six passers hit or exceeded 100 against the Packers. Green Bay went 3-3 in those games and finished with a 10-6 record and a playoff berth.

Defending the pass has always been important, even in the days when the running game was more prevalent. In winning three straight championships (1965-67), the Packers were also home to the league’s lowest defensive passer rating three years in succession.

Packers’ opponents earned ratings of 48.2, 46.1 and 41.5 during that run. In those three years combined, Green Bay surrendered 31 TD passes while snagging 81 interceptions.

That’s impressive. But that was a different era, and the game has changed.

Asking a team to produce a defensive passer rating below 50 in this day and age is not realistic. However, asking a defense to clock in below 100 is not only reasonable, it should be demanded by coaches and players alike.

Defenseless Passer Ratings
Seasons in which the Packers’ defensive passer rating wound up being greater than 90.

Rate       Season   Record
100.5      2017       7-7
99.1        2004       10-6
95.9        2016       10-6
95.9        2013       8-7-1
pro-football-reference.com served as a reference for this story.

A Rose By Any Other Name

LOOKING BACK
By John Turney
Back in the "day", the starting lineups on the play-by-plays were pretty straightforward but in a good-faith effort to inform the media there began to be some changes in the late-1980s and early 1990s and they continue through today.

We will touch on a just a few. Certainly, it isn't a comprehensive treatment of the subject, but we may bore you enough that you think it might be a comprehensive treatment.

The first one is not a new position but an odd listing. It comes from a 1991 game and the Saints have three DEs list, no tackle or nose tackle. Someone had to be the in the middle, no?


The same year the Buccaneers were played a 3-4 and they list on "DL" and the more traditional "NT" and "DE". It was one of the early hybrid defenses and it featured ex-Redskin Dexter Manley and OLBer  Broderick Thomas who he ended the season with a career-high of 11 sacks and 15.0 stuffs and 7 forced fumbles to go with his 124 tackles. He played a lot of DE with a hand in the ground in passing situations.
In 1994 the Falcons had a "Falcon" rusher and a "Star" defensive back.
Later the Buccaneers played a flop 4-3 defense, where one defensive tackle played over the center all the time and the other defensive tackled played 3-technique and switched of "flopped" sides rather than slid to the left or right. Santana Dotson was the 3-tech called an "under tackle" and listed as "UT". In 1995 Warren Sapp took over that spot when Dotson went to Green Bay.

Teams designed the "NT" and "UT" or "DT" to this day.
The Chargers listed two ILBers in the 1990s when Junior Seau was there. It was  4-3 defense and Seau was the weakside linebacker, the "Will" but they played a stacked 4-3 so Seau was usually next to the MLB. It gave All-Pro voters a cop out since they could vote for Seah is an ILB rather than an OLBer, which is what he was almost all the time. Seau was certainly a HOF player and deserving of his All-Pro selections but it took a slot from other legitimate inside linebackers and gave in effect an extra slot to some OLBer in that era.
Here, the ELE represents "Elephant" the position that Chris Doleman is listed in the play-by-play. There were players before him and after him that played the position, which was a hybrid OLBer/DE. Fred Dean did that some, Charles Haley did it a lot. After that Tim Harris, Richard Dent, Rickey Jackson, Kevin Greene and then Doleman played "Elephant".

 If you want to get technical, the 49ers playbook called their 4-3 scheme "Elephant" and the weak side end was called the "Whip" and that player could stand up and covert the scheme to a 3-4 just like that.
This is not from the 49ers playbook, but it has the same terminology.
Derrick Thomas began as a 3-4 OLBer but as time went on the Chiefs moved him around, for various reasons, too detailed to get into here. But he'd play linebacker in a 4-3 in base, then play DE in passing downs. In the late 1990s they gave that position a name at it was "Falcon". In the starting lineup below it's "Falc". It's the same concept as the 49er "Elephant" and 3-4 linebacker in  4-3 scheme. At least that's what Thomas once called it.

The Saints listed "OE" and "CE" for open end and closed end in 1996

In the mid-2000s the Dolphins listed Jason Taylor as an "OE" and again, it's the same concept as the Elephant and Falcon. Taylor would go away from the tight end and rush the passer, but, at times drop into coverage—another DE/OLB hybrid.
In the mid-2000s the Cowboys began to play a 3-4 defense and the weak inside linebacker, in this instance it's Scott Shanle, was the "Jack" linebacker. The Jets also had a "Jack" inside linebacker

These ILB players have had various names over the years. We've seen "Ted", "Mo" and others. Below the Cowboy lineup is the Packers and they simply called it the "B" linebacker as did the Falcons but for the Falcons is was an outside linebacker, not and inside linebacker.




More recently, in 2015 to be precise, the Rams listed their Weakside Linebacker as a "WS", The player was Mark Barron, who was a converted safety but when Alex Ogletree was felled due to ti injury Barron took his spot. He played exclusive linebacker, but for weeks and weeks the lineup card given to the official scorers in the press box listed him as a "WS" which stood for "Weak Safety".
 At about the same time the Cardinals had a name for their inside linebacker Deone Bucannon and it as "$LB" or "Dollar/Money Backer".  Also, their SAM is a rush 'backer not unlike the Falcon or Elephant
The last couple of years the Houston Texans have the same spot, rush backer and they call it "Jack". Last year Jadeveon Clowney was a defensive end but this year he's the Jack. But both years he played up and down and rushed most of the time, but would cover a bit.

The Colts and Ravens both list their hybrid DE/OLBers as "Rush". Again, and we know it's repetitive, it's the same concept as the Falcon/Elephant/Jack.

As a rookie, Yannick Ngakoue was listed as a "Leo" which was their name for the DE/OLBer position. They called the strong side linebacker (what most coaches called Sam) by the name "Otto".  We suspect "Otto" is a name for the "outside to the tight end", which means stong-side OLBer.
 And last year (2016) the Chargers has a straightforward listing of their defense:
But this year they have the "Leo" and the "Otto" which Gus Bradley brought with him from Jacksonville. Bradley used those names in Seattle but they never found their way into the play-by-plays, it was only internal at the time, though their press releases would use those terms sometimes.
However, after this year's bye week the Chargers didn't use the esoteric names and began to call Melvin Ingram a DE and Kyle Emanuel an OLB.

Calais Campbell—Edge or Interior?

By John Turney
Calais Campbell is having a great year for the Jacksonville Jaguars. The 31-year old is having a career-year while playing for the top defense in the NFL.

In this past off-season, he signed a Calais Campbell signed a 4-year, $60 million contract with the Jacksonville Jaguars, leaving behind the Arizona Cardinals with whom he had played nine seasons. He also left behind the Cardinals hybrid 3-4 defense and to the Jaguars 4-3 scheme. By 'hybrid' we mean it was a one-gap defense where Campbell usually lined us as a defensive end in likely running downs where the opponent was in base offense and when the opponent played 3-wide receivers, or four he would line up as a defensive tackle and rusher from inside.

Campbell was doing what many defensive ends did in the 3-4. Howie Long, for example, would do the same thing. He was a left end in base and a right defensive tackle in nickle/dime. It was a normal thing.

Was was less common was a 4-3 defensive end to move to defensive tackle in passing situations. It would happen (Bubba Smith did it a lot, for one instance). The defensive end "reducing" to tackle was a way to get a quicker, faster athlete at end and move a bigger, stronger type inside—to deal with double-teams and to use power moves on centers and guards.

This year Campbell is doing just that, playing defensive end (lined up over a tackle or tight end) in base defense when the offense is showing run or in base offense (with a fullback or two tight ends) and playing defensive tackle (lined up over a guard over even a center) in likely passing downs. And "reduction" of Campbell has worked well.

Campbell has a career-high in sacks (14.5) and hurries (20) and QB hits (28).
Certainly, Campbell will be named to the Pro Bowl tomorrow as one of the three defensive ends, and deservedly so. However, we ask how he will be handled by the Associated Press voters at the end of the season. The PFWA voters, we would surmise, will count him among the defensive ends. The PFWA (one of the three semi-official All-Pro teams as noted by the 2011 NFLPA CBA, the Hall of Fame and most experienced football researchers) All-Pro team is composed of two defensive ends and two tackles. But, the AP All-Pro team is no longer set up that way.

In 2016 the AP had it's voters choose two "edge rushers" and two "defensive interior" players. Edge rushers are defined as players who operate around the edges of the defense, like defensive ends and outside linebackers in a 3-4 defense. That is unless you are Von Miller, who the Broncos organization called a "linebacker" rather than an edge rusher and as a result he got a relatively easy path to the All-Pro team, not having to compete with all the other edge rushers who had great seasons in 2016.

Because of that the AP voters (most of them) had the opportunity to vote for three edge rushers rather than two and the final team ended up with three edges players on the First-team and were short a linebacker on the First-team.

How does this relate to Campbell? Well, in our view, though he IS a defensive end and defends the edge and sets the edge on run plays he's not an "edge rusher" or full-time edge player. He's a hybrid.

Here are the stills from all of the plays he was credited for a sack or half-sack this year and anyone can see two-thirds of these plays Campbell is inside.
 (all credit to NFL Replay)


















So, will he be considered an "interior" player or an "edge" player? He is truly both. He's two linemen in one, a lot like Certs—
 And he's good at both end and tackle, but the dominant portion of his game comes from the inside, it always has.