By John Turney
Coy Bacon |
Defensive end Dwight Freeney and return specialist Devin Hester are two of the seven members of a Hall-of-Fame Class of 2024 that tilts heavily to one side of the ball.
And that's defense.
Look who joins them: Defensive tackle Steve McMichael, linebackers Patrick Willis and Randy Gradishar and defensive ends Julius Peppers and Freeney. That means that wide receiver Andre Johnson is the only offensive finalist who will be enshrined in August.
But it's not Johnson or the others who interest me. It's Hester and Freeney, and here's why: Their elections raise the possibility of other one-dimensional players reaching Canton ... with the key word there being "possibility." If nothing else, their elections offer others hope where there was little before.
With Hester, that's easy to explain. He's the first return specialist ... period ... to be inducted. Until now, there were only three specialists enshrined in Canton. Two were kickers (Jan Stenerud and Morten Andersen) and one was a punter (Ray Guy). But now that Hester's in, other dominant returners may get a shot, too, with Billy "White Shoes" Johnson and Rick Upchurch the most obvious.
Both made all-decade teams in the 1970s and 1980s. Both were also All-Pro and Pro Bowlers multiple times, as well as league leaders in punt returns, and both are still high on all-time lists for punt return yards, touchdowns and yards per return. Plus, there were two return specialists named to the NFL's 100th anniversary team. Hester was one. Johnson was the other.
Before Hester, he and Upchurch were often considered 1A and 1B among all-time punt returners.
Like Hester, Johnson and Upchuch also started occasionally at wide receiver (Hester played some defensive back, as well), but they are Hall-worthy because they could take punts and kicks to the house better than others in their era. Or any era, for that matter. And isn't that what the Hall of Fame is about? Finding those who separated themselves from their peers?
Hester did. So did "White Shoes" and Upchurch.
And since we're speaking of specialists, maybe it's time to revive Steve Tasker's candidacy. He was a nine-time semifinalist as a modern-era candidate but never made it to the final 15. However, now that Canton has its first return specialist, a precedent has been set ... and that may make his case a bit stronger.
Now let's look at Freeney.
First-ballot choice Julius Peppers was a pretty complete defensive end. He wasn't the best run-stopper among Hall-of-Fame peers at his position, but he made enough plays vs. the run that no one would suggest he was a one-dimensional player. But Dwight Freeney? Not so much.
He was always among the best pass rushers of his era ... and of all time ... but he created more than just sacks. He created tons of pressures, knocking down quarterbacks and chasing them out of the pocket. Plus, he did it with a rare skillset, exploding off the ball to make off-balance tackles. With 4.48 40 speed, he could fly around the edge and motor to the quarterback.
But if the tackle overset to the outside, then Freeney really had him with the patented counter-move --- the inside spin. No, he didn't invent the spin move. He perfected it. And his success with it caused a lot of later pass rushers to copy it. You cannot watch football on a Sunday (or Saturday for that matter) without seeing the move multiple times.
But that focus on hitting the quarterback came at a cost: It left the spinmaster vulnerable to the run. He didn't drop many running backs for losses or at the line of scrimmage, as the record book shows. In his career, Freeney was credited with 36 run stuffs -- tackles for loss on running backs.
For a quick comparison, look at former Baltimore pass rusher Terrell Suggs, who's eligible for the Hall of Fame in 2025. He had 101. Then there's five-time Hall finalist Jared Allen. He had 69.
Freeney was a rush-first guy who performed in a scheme and an era where playing the run was less important than it had been. So what he did ... and did superbly ... was lauded by his coaches. They let Freeney do what he did best -- namely, rush the passer -- and let others worry about the run.
That ethos was not prevalent in previous generations. Defensive linemen who didn't play the run were criticized by coaches, other players, writers and even fans -- even if it was only partially true or true for occasional seasons. But with Freeney's election, fairness dictates that those rush-first guys now get a second look.
Like who, you ask?:
-- Let's start with Mark Gastineau. In ten seasons he had 107-1/2 sacks, though some are unofficial as they happened prior to 1982. He was All-Pro in 1982-85 and second-team in 1981 and went to the Pro Bowl all five seasons. He often got dogged out in the media for not playing the run, even by other All-Pro defensive ends. But in his era, no one -- no one -- got to the quarterback or hurried him more than Mark "Conan the Barbarian" Gastineau.
Maybe now he has a shot at a Gold Jacket.
-- Then there's Al "Bubba" Baker. He exploded onto the NFL scene with 23 sacks, 16 and then 17-1/2 in his first three seasons and ended his career with 131, though, like Gastineau's some are unofficial. He didn't have a reputation as a poor run defender but he wasn't a great one, either. He was a prototypical blind-side defensive end who was concerned about getting to the quarterback before all else. If he found a running back on his way there, all the better. And, like Freeney, Baker had a fair spin move of his own.
Baker was All-Everything as a rookie and went to three Pro Bowls.
-- Another example was Coy Bacon, the pass-rushing gypsy. He played for the Rams, the Chargers, Bengals, Redskins and even had a stint with the USFL Washington Federals. And, at every stop, he harassed quarterbacks. Three times he was voted to the Pro Bowl and three times he was second-team All-Pro. Though he retired before sacks became official, NFL gamebooks reveal he had 130-1/2 in his career, including 21-1/2 in 1976.
Coy could bring the heat but never got a sniff of Canton. Maybe that changes now.
Time will tell.
Regardless, it does seem that the Hall-of-Fame seniors' committee will have more players on its plate in the future because cases previously closed to specialists and one-dimensional players possibly are reopened because similar players -- i.e., Hester and Freeney -- will be enshrined this summer. And what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
From Brian wolf
ReplyDeleteGood article, but these voters have irritated me. On other sites we debate about the HOF having an unofficial character clause. Its not supposed to be that way but it obviously is, or Jim Tyrer, Darren Sharper and Buddy Parker would be in the HOF.
Someone on zoneblitz.com suggested that the Hall Of Fame itself sets the preliminary list for voters to choose from, but who the hell decides to take a Jim Tyrer or Darren Sharper off the preliminary vote? What if the fans themselves did write-in votes, are they simply ignored?
The process has to start at the preliminary level and all through the process, the players and coaches should be judged strictly upon football alone, during their careers, not what was done off the field.
Its tough with Powell because he was trying to improve the lot of the black football player, during seasons, while playing, much less off the field and he goes from team to team and gets voted down for the HOF, from voters who DISREGARD their own seniors committee!
Like the three AAFC teams including the dominant Cleveland Browns, The NFL absorbed every AFL team and their statistics-history, warts and all, and Powell was a great player, just like Dante Lavelli, Mac Speedie and Marion Motley, who piled up numbers in the AAFC. Despite being absorbed into the NFL, the 49ers cant even get their coach, Buck Shaw inducted, despite being one of the AAFC's best coaches. Like John pointed out, Alworth, Maynard, Dawson and Brown played in these early AFL years, piling up numbers against weaker competition but still made the HOF, why cant Powell or Abner Haynes or Lionel Taylor or Jim Hennigan?
The process for voting for the HOF simply has to change. There has to be more researchers and historians who actually know the game, get to vote, instead of team writers and beat writers who get younger every year. If they dont know the history of their team, league, or even other aspects of professional football history, they shouldnt get to vote.
If there is no unofficial character clause with the HOF, then prove it and take a public relations black eye by inducting Tyrer, Sharper and Parker, immediately ...
I wont hold my breath.
anybody think the circumstances surrounding the death of a certain former Ram, Baltimore Colt, Pittsburgh Steeler defensive tackle from the 1950s and early 60s hasn't been a significant factor in his not being inducted into Canton?
DeleteBW ...
ReplyDeleteHaha, now that my rant is over back to the article. Another great pass rusher who wasnt great against the run was Cedrick Hardman but he will have to get a look as a senior candidate like the other three. Other than Gene Brito, Harvey Martin, Jim Katcavage and George Andrie, who was awesome in postseason, Hardman would be my next choice for the HOF amongst senior defensive ends.
I really hope John is right about the returners but I dont think anyone, including Corradelle Patterson, will make the HOF now that Hester was voted in. Darren Sproles was an all-purpose weapon for different teams but if he doesnt make the semifinalist list when he is eligible, it will prove my point. The next special teams player to make the HOF will probably be Adam Vinatieri.
....interesting response as always BW! When you study film (my wheelhouse), and then look at the stats you cannot help but wonder why certain players from past generations are not looked at in detail? though the list is long, Al Wistert stands out, and of course there are others would gladly detail what I saw on film.
ReplyDeleteThanks T.J. and yes I would love to hear your comments on Wistert and Jimmy Patton.
DeleteAwesome. Thank you for bringing up the cases for Rick Upchurch and Billy White Shoes Johnson. Gastineau needs to be inducted. There are 22 defensive ends in the Hall of Fame, and Gastineau was All-Pro more times than all but eight of them!
ReplyDeleteThe "knocks" on Gastineau in my opinion were the criticism for being a rush-first guy, maybe PEDs, and shorter career. None of those things really apply since now there are rush specialiss, guys who tested positive and guys with 8-9-10 year careers.
DeleteDon't know if it will cause senior committee to bump him up or not, but as you mention a lot of All-Pros ...
From Brian wolf ...
ReplyDeleteA question for John or anyone who might know ... I noticed that play-by-play game information went back to 1989 on pro football reference.com. Would any other source or books contain play-by-play game information for games going back to the 1950s? Would Stathead or Elias have that info or would track team game sheets going back that far?
Thanks
PFWA - in the members only section has quite a few --- under Gamebooks committee
Delete