Why It's Time Canton Wakes Up to 49ers' Great Billy Wilson

By John Turney 

Billy Wilson

When you play on a team of stars, it's easy to be overlooked ... even if you're one of those stars. Such is the case for former San Francisco 49ers' receiver Billy Wilson.

Never heard of him? Not surprising because he's one of those forgotten players who deserves a chance to have his case heard by the Pro Football Hall-of-Fame's board of selectors.

Except he never has. 

He's never been a finalist nor semifinalist for Canton, including the Centennial Class of 2020 when he wasn't one of 20 finalists, and his name seldom -- if ever -- surfaces when the Hall's seniors committee convenes. But that doesn't mean he's not qualified.

He is.

Playing from 1951-60, Wilson led the decade in receptions ... by a lot. Nicknamed "Goose," he had 404, far ahead of the next-best receiver, Billy Howton, with 342. Three times he led the NFL in catches -- 1954, 1956 and 1957 -- tying the Eagles' Pete Pihos for the most titles in the decade and Raymond Berry, Lance Alworth, Sterling Sharpe and Tom Fears for the most in a career. 

One difference. They all own Gold Jackets. Wilson does not.

It's also more receiving crowns than Jerry Rice, who had two, and let's stop right there. Before you get the wrong idea, I'm not comparing Wilson's career to the G.O.A.T. I'm just noting that three receiving titles are a lot -- so many that even the greatest pass catcher in NFL history doesn't have that many. Wilson was also third in receiving yards and second in touchdown receptions in the 1950s, all the more remarkable when you consider that he played for a team that ran for more yards than anyone but the Los Angeles Rams.

The 49ers of the 1950s featured the "Million Dollar Backfield," with Hall-of-Famers everywhere: Quarterback Y.A. Tittle and running backs Joe "The Jet" Perry, Hugh "The King" McElhenny and John Henry Johnson. No wonder they threw fewer passes than all but a few NFL teams; they had the horses. And those horses grabbed the lion's share of attention.

But you can't keep defenses honest if you don't throw the ball, and the 49ers did ... mostly to Billy Wilson. He was THE receiving option. In fact, when he retired after the 1960 season, he ranked second only to then-G.O.A.T. Don Hutson in receptions and touchdown catches and was third in receiving yards.

So what's missing here? Championships, that's what, and that may have hurt his Hall-of-Fame candidacy. Not only wasn't he on a league champion; he was part of a franchise that participated in just one playoff game during his tenure -- the 1958 Western Conference contest vs. Detroit. But look what happened: Though the Lions won, 31-27, the 6-3, 190-pound Wilson caught nine Tittle passes for 107 yards and a touchdown.

And all this after getting a late start in pro football.

Born on a Cherokee reservation in Sayre, Okla., Wilson moved with his family to California at the age of 3 when his parents decided to escape the "Dust Bowl" of The Great Depression. After high school, he served 18 months in the U.S. Navy, then attended San Jose State where he shattered nearly every pass-receiving record. A 1949-50 All-Pacific Coast honoree, he dazzled as a receiver, excelled as an offensive blocker and dominated as a defensive end. Over three college seasons, he hauled in 66 catches for 948 yards and 10 touchdowns. 

“Billy’s a lock for the pros," his coach, Bob Bronzan said then, "potentially the league’s top rookie end.”

He was prophetic. Clearly, he knew something about his talented receiver that others would soon discover.

Six times Wilson was invited to Los Angeles to play in the Pro Bowl, including 1955 when he was the game's MVP. He was a second-team All-Pro in 1954 and named by media outlets to all the major teams. One year later, he was a first-team choice on the players' All-Pro squad (NEA), followed by first-team selections to the UPI and Sporting News' All-Pro teams in 1956.

Then, in 1957 he was first-team everywhere -- AP, UPI, NEA, The Sporting News; you name it, he was on it. He was the best receiver in the NFL. Bar none. A second-team All-Pro (NEA) in 1958 and 1959, he was a six-time first-or-second-team All-Pro -- including three times times on the first team and once as a consensus pick.

So how does that compare to Hall of Famers? Well, he populated more teams than Art Monk, Bob Hayes, Tommy McDonald, Tom Fears, Charley Taylor, Harold Carmichael, Isaac Bruce, John Stallworth, Charlie Joiner, Andre Reed, Bobby Mitchell and "Crazylegs" Hirsch, just to name a dozen.

The bottom line is that his "all" resume is in line with many receivers with busts in Canton. Yet despite the numbers and honors, Wilson has yet to break through from the Hall's preliminary lists.

And that's as wrong as it is baffling.

"He was the top pass receiver of his time," Hall-of-Fame coach Bill Walsh told the San Francisco Chronicle, "and one of the finest blockers; just a great all-around end. As I've seen the men inducted into the Hall, including myself, I've thought that Billy certainly should have been enshrined some years ago."

Walsh later told the San Jose Mercury-News that "Billy had speed and incomparable agility. He was also one of the best blocking receivers the game has seen."

Walsh wasn't alone. Others, including several Hall-of-Fame coaches, lined up behind him to praise Wilson:

-- "(H)e truly was a great receiver," said Don Shula. "He's one of the few players of another era that would excel today.''

-- Marveling at Wilson's ability to get free on broken plays, Weeb Ewbank wrote that what drove him crazy was "Y.A. Tittle's maddening ability to scramble at the last instant and hit Billy on the sideline for a keep-the-drive-alive first down." 

-- "Whenever we needed a big catch," said Tittle, "I went to him. I knew he would make the play."

--- "Billy Wilson," said former Cowboys' coach Tom Landry, "was almost impossible to cover."

Landry and Shula should know. Each was a defensive back in the 1950s. So was Rams' veteran Hall Haynes, who called Wilson the most difficult man in the league to cover. Wilson was especially dangerous on hook routes, turning his back on a defender before making the catch. And he did it so often that teammates started calling him "Poor Devil," as in that's what he made opponents look like on the indefensible pattern. 

"Billy had hands like glue," said former teammate Bob St. Clair, another Hall of Famer. "His ability to run after the catch was amazing. He is probably one of the most underrated players in NFL history."

I'll second that.

Wilson's case for the Pro Football Hall of Fame is compelling and deserves more, much more consideration than it's been given. Because let's be honest: It's been given little, if any. Given his statistical dominance in the 1950s, his exclusion from a Hall discussion is so indefensible that it makes Wilson ... well, the "poor devil."

His numbers, his honors and his endorsements from football luminaries all support Wilson as a strong seniors' candidate -- that is, if voters ever revisit his candidacy, which they should. Because Billy Wilson wasn’t a faint twinkle amidst cosmic giants. He was a radiant force, propelling his team, redefining the game and blazing brilliantly.

Quality over Quantity? That's 'Tombstone' Jackson

By John Turney 

Rich Jackson

How short is too short for the Pro Football Hall of Fame, and how elite is elite? OK, let's try putting those two ideas together and asking the question another way: Can a player with a short career be considered great enough to be enshrined in Canton?

I think you know the answer.

Look at Chicago's Gale Sayers. He's the classic example of the post-two-way era. His seven-year career was long enough because for five of them he was a phenom ... making first-team All-Pro every year and wowing fans like few had before.

Or since.

But Sayers was the seven-season exception ... until 2017, that is. Then along came Kenny Easley, Terrell Davis, Tony Boselli and this year's seniors' inductee, Sterling Sharpe. So, if seven years is acceptable for those guys, why not for former defensive lineman and linebacker Rich "Tombstone" Jackson? He wasn't the five-time All-Pro like the "Kansas Comet," but he does seem comparable to others in terms of peak performance.

Let me explain.

Jackson was called one of the two best defensive ends Sports Illustrated's Paul Zimmerman ever saw. The other was Deacon Jones. But the former Hall-of-Fame voter never could get Jackson's name included in a serious discussion for Canton, mostly because of longevity. He didn't have it.

That didn't matter to "Dr. Z," who was all about quality over quantity. If he was considering two candidates, and one was better than the other -- even though he played fewer seasons and games -- he'd choose him. As I said, he always leaned on the side of quality. However, he wasn't persuasive enough with Jackson. He was never a Hall-of-Fame finalist or semifinalist.

But with the recent inductions of finalists with short careers, maybe he was on to something. When two candidates are close, maybe quality IS better than quantity. And what Zimmerman saw in Rich Jackson was a dominant defensive end who frightened and beat up offensive tackles.

At his peak, there were no better defensive ends in the NFL. He was an elite pass rusher who could go around or through blockers. But he was more than a one-trick pony. He was a force in the run game, too, acting more like a blocker than a tackler. Instead of absorbing blocks and trying to fight them off, he put his shoulder under an opposing lineman's pads and drove him backward ... off the line of scrimmage.

Essentially, his object was to win the collision, and he could -- often hurting his opponent. 

"I would run-block the run blockers, if you know what I mean," said the Southern University grad. "What they were trying to do to me, I just got there quicker and lower." 

As the Broncos' enforcer, Jackson filled an additional role on defense. His job was to teach lessons to offensive linemen guilty of frequent fouls, especially holding. When Lyle Alzado was a rookie with Denver, for instance, a tackle tried "trash-talking" him until Alzado complained to "Tombstone." So the two switched positions, and, according to Alzado, Jackson "knocked the guy out. Head slap. All I heard was pow! And this guy was on the ground."

Then there was the time Jackson went mano-a-mano with Hall-of-Fame tackle Bob Brown.

"Rich just devastated the guy," said Alzado, who described Jackson as the toughest man he ever met. "Rich had his nose bleeding, knocked out his teeth, broke his helmet. I saw Rich knock guys to their knees with the head slap. Knocked them on their back."

Hard to believe, but he did this from a 245-250-pound frame. Though not huge by NFL standards, Jackson was strong. Legendarily strong. He may have had more natural strength than any defensive end ever, bench-pressing over 550 pounds. By almost all accounts, when healthy, Rich Jackson was a mismatch for all opponents. In fact, Hall-of-Fame quarterback Len Dawson said that when he thought of him, he thought of pain.

I don't care that his career was short. Neither should the Hall's seniors committee. After all, his three All-Pro seasons are the same as the other seven-season phenoms -- Boselli, Davis, Easley and Sterling Sharpe. But Jackson was also on the AFL's All-Time team. He was also voted his league or conference's defensive lineman of the year in 1969 and 1970. 

According to Broncos' gamebooks, in his three All-Pro seasons, "Tombstone" averaged 90 tackles, 11 sacks, seven passes defensed and two forced fumbles. He ended his career with 45 sacks, and while that total is not prodigious, remember this: He was the individual opponents targeted on the Denver defense, often assigning a tight end or running back to assist tackles who couldn't block him.

Unfortunately, the Broncos of Jackson's era (1967-71) were not winners. He had winning seasons only in his first and last pro seasons, and they weren't with Denver. They were with the 1966 Raiders and the 1972 Browns..

Maybe that backed off voters, I don't know. But times have changed, and voters should, too. A star player who is in the Black College Football Hall of Fame, the Greater New Orleans Sports Hall of Fame and the Louisiana Sports Hall of Fame deserves a shot to be in the ultimate Hall of Fame -- the one in Canton, Ohio.

Anyone with a peak like Rich Jackson's must be considered. 

Career stats and honors—

Why Bucko Kilroy Is 'The Epitome of a Hall Contributor'

By John Turney 

Bucko Kilroy

Francis Joseph "Bucko" Kilroy's 64-year career in the National Football League (NFL) as a player, scout and executive left an indelible mark on the sport. His contributions, both on the field and in the front office, make a compelling case for his induction as a contributor into the Pro Football Hall of Fame. 

Yet in the 10 years that the Hall's board of selectors voted on contributors, he never was discussed as a finalist.

I know, he was a semifinalist for this year's class. But he didn't make the final cut. In fact, Kilroy's most significant foray in the Hall's voting process occurred in 2020, when a specially selected committee chose him as one of 10 contributor finalists for the Centennial Class commemorating the NFL's 100th anniversary.

He wasn't elected then, either. Paul Tagliabue, George Young and Steve Sabol were.

It's time that changes for the most obvious of reasons: Bucko Kilroy is the epitome of a Hall-of-Fame contributor, with a 64-year NFL career surpassed only by Wellington Mara. His tenure as a player, coach, scout and executive outlasted even George Halas. But it's not his longevity in those roles that makes him an ideal choice; it's that he was successful in all of them.

"Very few in the Hall have his resume," said former NFL executive Upton Bell, who hired Kilroy as New England's player personnel director in 1971. "He should've been elected to Canton a long time ago."

A Philadelphia native, Kilroy earned All-America honors as Temple’s first standout lineman before becoming a two-way player at offensive and middle guard for his hometown Eagles. But he wasn't just a player; he was an outstanding player, making first-or-second-team All-Pro every year from 1948 through 1954. He also went to three Pro Bowls and was named to the NFL’s 1940s' all-decade team.

Kilroy's presence on the line anchored a unit that powered Steve Van Buren to the Hall of Fame and led the Eagles to NFL titles in 1948 and 1949. In both championship games, the Eagles' 5-2 defensive front -- with Kilroy at its heart -- delivered historic shutouts, the only back-to-back title game shutouts in NFL history.

 "I enjoyed playing defense," Kilroy once remarked. "Offense was drudgery."

His reputation as one of the era’s toughest players (or dirtiest, depending on your perspective) was cemented when Life magazine labeled him the NFL’s dirtiest in 1955 in an article entitled, "Savagery on Sunday." The story featured a grinning cover photo of Kilroy, with more shots inside and commentary from former football players that were supposed to corroborate the so-called "dirty play."

"If you played the Eagles," said Chicago Bears' Hall-of-Famer Doug Atkins, "you knew Bucko was going to get his shots in -- late hits, elbows, stepping on you in the pile. You didn’t shake his hand after the game; you checked to see if he broke it."

Another famous anecdote involves a game in which an opposing lineman allegedly told his coach, "If you want me to block Kilroy, you better give me a weapon."

Exaggerated or not, stories like these cemented Kilroy’s legacy as a feared enforcer -- someone whose name was as much a warning as it was an identity. Nevertheless, Bucko wasn't pleased with the label, and he and one of his teammates, Wayne Robinson, sued the publisher, Time, Inc., for $250,000. They won and were awarded $11,600 each.

Dirty? Maybe. OK, likely. But when you're called "bad boy" by Hall-of-Fame quarterback Otto Graham or an "onery critter" by Lions' end Cloyce Box, that's not really a knock. I think it's more like a compliment for that era.

When he died in 2006, Kilroy was quoted by Patriots.com as having said, "It was smash-mouth, or what I called 'mash-mouth' football in those years. The rules were different. First, you played two ways up to 1950. Another thing, forearms were legal."

And, apparently, enjoyable.

"We didn't play for money," Bucko said. "We played for fun."

But Kilroy’s impact didn't end there It extended far beyond the field. After coaching for the Eagles, he revolutionized scouting, creating the NFL scouting combine and pioneering the Dallas Cowboys’ data-driven player evaluation system. Joining Dallas in 1965, Kilroy and Hall-of-Fame executive Gil Brandt transformed drafting into a science, relying on measurable data over guesswork.

"The more measurements you got, the more you could confirm," Kilroy explained.

His approach replaced outdated methods like the reliance on college football yearbooks with a systematic, numbers-based process.

"Gil Brandt and Bucko put together a system in Dallas," recalled former GM Ernie Accorsi. "Bucko never got enough credit. He took that scouting system to New England and refined it."

In Dallas, Kilroy helped draft Roger Staubach despite his Naval commitment, laying the groundwork for Tom Landry’s dominant 1970s' teams. But it was Brandt who won the Gold Jacket, not Kilroy. And maybe that's because he went elsewhere, while Brandt stayed put during the Cowboys' dynasty from the mid-1960s through the mid 1980s.

But Kilroy left in 1971 for New England, where he spent 36 years as scouting director, GM, vice president, and consultant. His keen eye identified Hall-of-Famers John Hannah and Mike Haynes, along with stars like Russ Francis, Stanley Morgan, Raymond Clayborn, Steve Nelson, Julius Adams, and Steve Grogan -- players who turned the Patriots into playoff contenders in the 1970s and 1980s and contributed to Super Bowl teams in 1985 and 1996.

As an innovator, Kilroy co-founded the National Football Scouting Combine, now a cornerstone of the NFL's talent evaluation process. He was also credited with helping to shape the modern NFL draft and contributing to the development of the Super Bowl as we know it today.

The Boston Globe in 1982 called him "the man who helped create the science of pro scouting," while Dick Steinberg, a former Jets' GM and Kilroy protégé, said, "He knows as much about pro football as anyone in history."

His 36 years with the Patriots included contributions to 14 of the franchise's 15 playoff seasons and all five of their Super Bowl appearances during his tenure, including their first in 1985.

If that doesn’t qualify, what does?

His inductions into the North Catholic High School Hall of Fame, Temple University Athletics Hall of Fame and Philadelphia Sports Hall of Fame underscore his regional and institutional significance. But his contributions to the NFL warrant more. They warrant national attention from the Hall's board of selectors.

Hopefully, sooner rather than later.

TUESDAY TIDBITS: "40 Men Together Can't Lose"

By TJ Troup 

George Allen and his Bears defense

Today is George Allen's birthday, and while there are so many excellent quotes could use, chose one of his most famous for the title of this narrative. Allen figures prominently in what could be a War and Peace saga, yet will attempt to focus as much as possible. Has been a while since have written here at the Journal, yet have been digging deep on an area of research that should have been discussed years ago. Ready? 

Here goes—How many times during a broadcast or an interview with a coach do we hear the phrase "we must win the battle of the turnovers". While this is an accurate statement, the statement is murky since a win% is not applied to the statement. 

Years ago became known across the country for my in-depth research on interception returns, yet there is also another way to take the ball away from the opposition. Recover an opponent's fumble. The NFL began keeping individual opponent fumble recoveries in 1945, thus now have virtually complete individual opponent fumble recoveries for each team for the past 80 years. 

Would you be surprised to know that the league, and many so-called accurate research databases do not have accurate data in this category? Possibly since it was the last category on the scoresheets, or maybe even an afterthought—is time for this fascinating category to be accurate, in-depth, and tell the tale. Having so many valuable resources has allowed me to make corrections. Especially Steve Sabol and the film he sent me. 

Hopefully there will be teams, or websites that would interested in having this data, and would relish hearing from them. Are there questions that all of us might find intriguing? Which team has recovered the most opponent fumbles in league history? Which team has the highest win percentage of all the teams when they recover an opponent fumble? How many players have achieved the double take-away historically ( recovering an opponent fumble and intercepting a pass in the same game), and, finally how many players have recorded a sack, and an opponent fumble recovery in the same game? What player holds the league record for most consecutive games recovering an opponent fumble? 

Since this is a territorial game, which team holds the record for most yards advancing an opponent fumble in a game? For the sake of discussion, what is the win percentage of a team that returns opponent fumbles over 100 yards in a game? There have been many coaches that "preached" the takeaway, yet George Allen remains in that small fraternity that had success in doing so. 

When he became the defensive coordinator of the Bears during the '62 season, he was attempting to put a quality defense on the field. The Bears championship season of '63 remains one the best ever for a team in taking the ball away, but in '64 (his only losing year) the Bears did not take the ball away. 

A rebounding and contending season in '65 led him to Los Angeles, and then Washington; all winning seasons and years in which his defense took the ball away. As always, sure look forward to comments you have regarding this article.

What Am I Missing on Riley Matheson?

 By John Turney 

Riley Matheson, #11

In the second week of March, Hall-of-Fame voter Clark Judge organized a meeting with historians and researchers to evaluate the top Pro Football Hall of Fame candidates from the two-way era (roughly 1920–1949, with some flexibility). 

The group discussed contributions and players, but only four earned unanimous support: Al Wistert, Ox Emerson, Verne Lewellen, and Lavvie Dilweg (WELD). Other greats came up, but none achieved universal backing like the four chosen.

One name, Rams guard/linebacker Riley "Rattlesnake" Matheson, appeared on at least three participants’ lists but I spoke up for him because over the years his name had not come up as often in causal online discussions I have read or participated in.

Though he had many similar qualities Matheson never ranked alongside the “big four” (Wistert, Lewellen, Dilweg, and Emerson). My question was simple: "Why not? What am I missing?"

Im my view much of this kind of discussion (who has been passed over by Hall of Fame voters) partly traces back to Bob Carroll’s chapter in "The Hidden Game of Football" (co-authored by Pete Palmer and John Thorn), “Rumblings in the Pantheon.” Carroll argued that applying Bill James’ baseball logic—reassessing overlooked Hall of Fame candidates—could reveal glaring omissions in football. 

He spotlighted Al Wistert, detailing his credentials: multiple All-Pro selections, championships, and blocking for the era’s record-setting runner. Carroll’s charts of “alls” (All-Pros, Pro Bowls, All-Conference honors) highlighted players who stood out. Over the past 30 years, many from that chapter have been inducted, yet the "big four" (among others) remain on the outside.

However, if the James/Carroll premise holds (if player A is in the Hall of Fame and player B has very similar credentials then Player B should be in), why does Riley Matheson lag behind so much? and by that I mean why is his case not as universally accepted as the four selected by the historians this week?

Let’s compare:

• Like WELD, Matheson was a perennial All-Pro—six times, five of them consensus.

• Like the others, he won a championship, though Lewellen and Dilweg have multiple.

• Like Lewellen, he was not voted All-Decade honors.

• Like many, he appeared on All-Time teams, praised by players and media alike.

• Like Dilweg and Emerson, he left a statistical mark. From 1944 (after returning to the Rams from a loan to the Lions) through 1948, no linebacker in pro football intercepted more passes than Matheson—though defensive backs topped him, as should be expected

• From the 1944 through 1947 seasons the Rams led the NFL in yards per rush and twice led the NFL in rushing yards. They also led there league three times in yards per rush in that span.

To make sure, I confirmed with historian/author T.J. Troup, an expert on the era, who’s studied the film and knows players' roles inside out. If you ask him about some player from the mid-1940s not only will you find out he was exclusively a defensive back you'll learn of he was predominantly a safety or defensive halfback and if he was on the left or the right more when he was a halfback. 

Going back to when interceptions were official -- from 1940-48 there were linebackers with more interceptions. But only four -- Charley Brock, Ben Kish, Hall-of-Famer Bulldog Turner and Hall of Famer Alex Wojciechowicz.

Brock's coverage as a linebacker was special -- he's a vastly underrated player. Kish played a little bit of defensive back per Troup. However, none of them spent as much (if any) time with their hands in the dirt as a middle guard/defensive tackle. They just didn't. Matheson was a defensive linemen at least a third of the time ... if not more. And even with that he still picked off as many passes as he did. 

Actually, Matheson seemed like he could freelance whether he'd rush or cover and oftentimes put a hand on the ground when rushing or when it was a likely passing down. So say what you will, Matheson left a top-notch record.

Then there is the issue of longevity. Matheson also played longer than the big four: 10 NFL seasons plus two in the Western Inter-provincial Football Union (CFL’s Western Conference) so 12 season in pro football. 

All that and yet he’s not seen as their equal—or even on par with other notables. Why?

Does it boil down to film? Maybe. Does the fact that the Cleveland Rams were a bad team for the first half of Snake's career? Again, maybe. 

If it is the latter, then it's true. The Rams of the late-1930s and early 1940s were mostly second-division. Facts are facts. But if the issue is the former, them maybe folks can see the things he did.

No, he's not a superior athlete. He kind of has a hunched back, and it not fast or particularly big but for whatever reason as a defender he was always around the ball. He was in on a lot of tackles and when his film is compared to others, at least in the eyes of some, he compares well.

Here are some examples of his play for your review—note that usually Matheson is wearing #11, but he also wore #33 as well when with the Rams and #37 when he was with the 49ers. 

Some tackles—

A couple of pass defections—

Some blocks, both pass protection and run blocks, sweeps, etc.—

Here are some with pressure on passers—

Of course, there are more clips and yes, highlights do not a career make. But the point, for me, is to show that whatever the criticisms of Matheson might me, his film cannot be one of them. He makes a ton of plays, especially on defense. So, if folks say his All-Pro resume is light, or he played during World War II, or whatever, fine. Just apply it evenly to others who played in that era, who did not serve in the military. Just do the same with his film.

In fact, to me, his film enhances his case. He's a better player than I thought he was before taking a close look. 

But, you can decide for yourself. 

Asante Samuel Says He Deserves HOF Attention. Is He Right?

 By John Turney 

It seems that every few months Deion Sanders is involved with a story involving the Pro Football Hall of Fame, with his suggestion for "an upper room" in Canton to house its upper-echelon inductees the most noteworthy.

That idea was a non-starter.

But now it's not Deion starting a ruckus. It's former All-Pro cornerback Asante Samuel, who took to the social network X to make a Hall-of-Fame case for a defensive back he believes should be enshrined.

Himself.

"Here is your yearly reminder," he wrote. "Now let’s hear the excuses."

Instead, we heard the testimony. In 31 fewer regular-season games, Samuel intercepted just two fewer passes than Deion (53-51). He also picked off seven passes in the playoffs where Sanders had five - meaning each had 58 career picks, counting the postseason. Finally, we were reminded that both players own two Super Bowl rings.

But Samuel didn't stop there. He posted more stats comparable to the first-ballot Hall of Famer some consider the G.O.A.T of cornerbacks, provoking responses from others who suggested Samuel might want to reconsider his argument.

"Asante Samuel," said former All-Pro Ryan Clark on X, "was a very good football player, but there is no Hall of 'Very Good.' He can have all the technique conversations he wants with Deion Sanders, but do not throw rocks at Tanks.

"You can pull up all the stats you want, but who’s the better of these two should not be a conversation. Both men are far better than me, but Deion Sanders is in a different stratosphere from everyone. He’s the reason people wore 21, he manifested the term 'lockdown corner' & shifted the power in the NFL simply by changing jerseys."

Naturally, Samuel (whose X profile description is "Professional Sh*t Talker") fired back at Clark ... then Clark at Samuel ... and so it goes. I guess it could go on ad infinitum, but it won't. Almost all agree that Sanders was better than Asante Samuel. I know I do. But is that the question? I don't think so.

My question is: Why is Samuel "Sh*t Talking" at all? Simple. He must think he's worthy of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. So, THAT is the question. Does he  belong? Let's take a look.

A two-time AP All-Pro, four-time Pro Bowler and two-time interceptions leader, Sanders was New England's fourth-round pick (the 120th overall) of the 2003 NFL draft. As a rookie, he was an effective third corner, and by his second season a starter on a Patriots' team that won its second consecutive Super Bowl. But Samuel was more a contributor ... a "do-your-job" kind of guy ... than the star he would later become.

New England didn't win another Super Bowl while Samuel was there, but no fault could be laid at his feet. Over the next four years -- which totaled 11 playoff games (three with the Philadelphia Eagles) -- he excelled, snagging seven enemy passes and returning four for touchdowns. That's right: Four pick-sixes in the playoffs in four years.

Without question, Asante was someone who played big in the biggest games.

But he also played big in the regular season. In 2006, for instance, he led the NFL with 10 interceptions, though he somehow wasn't named All-Pro and didn't earn an invite to the Pro Bowl. The following year the All-Pro voting panel corrected its mistake, not only naming him to its team but making him a first-team All-Pro. So did the Pro Football Writers of America and Sporting News. Players, coaches and fans soon followed, asking him to join them in Hawaii for the first of four consecutive Pro Bowls.

After signing a big-money deal with the Eagles in 2009, he was voted second-team All-Pro and, one year later, was a first-team All-Pro according to the PFWA and Sporting News. And why not? Over that five-year span, Samuel totaled 36 interceptions, leading the NFL twice in that department as well as passes defensed.

Without question, he was a baller.

Few ever had a five-year run of productivity like Samuel. Plus, he did it for yet another team -- the Atlanta Falcons. After his four years with the Eagles, he was traded to the Falcons for a paltry seventh-round pick. But his play was hardly paltry. In his first year there, he intercepted five passes, returning them for 110 yards and a score in another Pro Bowl-level season for the 31-year-old corner.

All told, his 51 interceptions trail only Rod Woodson, Charles Woodson, Ed Reed, Aeneas Williams, Eric Allen, Ty Law and, yes, Deion among players whose careers began in 1987 or later. The common thread? All own Gold Jackets. 

But three of them spent parts of their careers as safeties. Asante Samuel did not. He's also not in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Nor has he been close. He's never been a finalist or semifinalist, and that should change. No, he's not "Prime Time," but who is? That's like comparing defensive ends to Reggie White. Some individuals are just talented freaks, and Deion Sanders is one of them.

But when you see Samuel in the same conversation with names like Williams, Allen and Law, you begin to think what you might not have before -- that maybe Asante Samuel has a point and should at least be included in a Hall-of-Fame conversation.

So let's start talking.

Ever Hear of 'Swede' Youngstrom? Here's Why You Should

 By John Turney 

Adolf Frederick ("Swede") Youngstrom was a formidable presence in the nascent years of professional football, a lineman whose skill and determination etched a lasting legacy in the game. However, the passage of time has obscured his name, and that's more than an unjust oversight. It's one that should change.

During the NFL's rough-and-tumble early era, "Swede" stood out as one of the league's premier guards. In fact, his prowess was so notable that Jeffrey Miller, author of "Buffalo’s Forgotten Champions: The Story of Buffalo’s First Professional Football Team;" considers him Hall-of-Fame worthy.

"It could be argued," Miller wrote, "that had the team he’s most closely tied to—the Buffalo All-Americans—secured a league championship, Youngstrom might have been Buffalo’s inaugural inductee into Canton’s revered Hall."

That's a striking claim, yet it carries a ring of truth. Youngstrom was remarkable, durable, decorated and a league champion. What he isn't is a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Hopefully, after reading this, you may understand why I, too, believe his case should be revisited. 

So let's start at the beginning, where Youngstrom’s introduction to football was anything but conventional. 

Born on May 24, 1897, in Waltham, Mass., he attended Waltham High School, where the football team practiced after classes. But because he weighed just 140 pounds, his parents were afraid he might get hurt. So they forbid him from playing. But by his senior year, Youngstrom defied their wishes and joined the team. Not only did he play, he played so well that a local newspaper highlighted his exploits ... which, in turn, provoked his father to covertly watch a practice. Rather than reprimand his son, he was so impressed by his performance that he gave him his blessing -- effectively helping to launch a storied career.

After high school, Youngstrom enrolled at Dartmouth College where he honed his skills in a robust football program and developed into a formidable guard. So skilled was he that, by his senior year in 1919, he earned consensus All-American honors by blocking an astonishing nine punts -- a testament to his athleticism and instincts. 

After graduating, he briefly ran a candy store in Hanover, N,H., with teammate and future Hall-of-Fame lineman Ed Healey, before joining the Buffalo All-Americans in 1920. The team was part of the newly formed American Professional Football Association (APFA), which became the NFL in 1922 and where Youngstrom made an immediate impact. He blocked nine punts in his rookie season, three of which were returned for touchdowns.

Yes, you read that right -- NINE blocked punts in a single season - and that was no aberration. 

Drawing from newspaper accounts, historian Nick Webster credits Youngstrom with 16 punts blocked punts during his pro career. However, he confirmed only four in Youngstrom’s debut season ... which means if the five additional blocks reported elsewhere hold true, Youngstrom's career total would climb to at least 21. And that’s a conservative estimate. Some feats went unrecorded, lost to the gaps in early football documentation.

So, what's the real total? Twenty-five? Thirty? Either is possible, even likely. Youngstrom was that good at rejecting punts, and it was no small accomplishment in his era. Teams then often punted on early downs, not just fourth, making someone with Youngstrom's talent a prized asset.

But he was more than that. He was one of the game's difference makers, a reputation that bolsters Miller’s assertation that Youngstrom deserves a bust in Canton.

His tenure with Buffalo—first with the All-Americans, later the Bisons— highlighted his reliability and talent. He anchored a squad that twice came close to an NFL title. In 1920, the All-Americans posted a 9-1-1 record, only to be overshadowed by the undefeated Akron Pros. With a 9-1-2 record the following year, they fell just short again -- this time edged out by George Halas’ Chicago Staleys at 9-1-1.

However, Youngstrom was first noted as an All-Pro that year.

After those near-misses, Buffalo's team was not quite as good ... but Youngstrom was. Starting in 1923, he earned All-NFL honors three years running. Moreover, as the only guard to make first-team All-NFL in 1923-25, he cemented his status as an elite interior lineman.

In 1926, he left Buffalo for the Frankford Yellow Jackets where, under Hall-of-Famer Guy Chamberlin, he finally claimed a league championship. Then he stepped into a player/coach role the next year, steering the team through a solid season, before retiring at the age of 30 after an eight-year career.

Youngstrom’s durability was remarkable. He played 96 games without missing a snap, and his career spanned the Buffalo All-Americans, Canton Bulldogs, Buffalo Bisons, Cleveland Bulldogs, and Frankford Yellow Jackets. Beyond the NFL, he also moonlighted with independent teams like the Millville Big Blue and Haven-Villa of Winter Haven, often suiting up on Saturdays before NFL Sundays.

In 2012, the Professional Football Researchers Association inducted the 6-foot-1, 187-pound lineman into its Hall of Very Good, but the Pro Football Hall of Fame hasn't acted on him. Youngstrom has never been a finalist for Canton.

"Youngstrom was actually the best guard of the era," said Miller, "since the only two guards in the Hall of Fame who played in the ‘20s—Michalske and Kiesling—actually played the majority of their careers in the 1930s. And Swede had as many All-Pro berths as any other guard during the ‘20s."

So that raises the question: Should Youngstrom have claimed one of those all-decade spots? Bob Carroll, who founded the Professional Football Researchers Association, thought so. He tapped him for his 1920s' all-decade team, a view echoed more recently by Ken Crippen of The Football Learning Academy.

Had that happened ... or had he been a multiple NFL champion ... maybe his name would have resonated with the Hall in the 1960s when it had more recognition. It’s impossible to know. What is clear is that he's been unfairly ignored. A perennial All-Pro, punt-blocking dynamo and linchpin on title-contending teams, Youngstrom has a resume that demands consideration.

He died on Aug. 5, 1968, at 71, leaving behind a legacy as a football trailblazer. From swatting punts at Dartmouth to Buffalo ... to dominating the pros ... to lifting a championship trophy with Frankford ... Youngstom epitomized the rugged brilliance of football’s formative years, an era all but forgotten by football fans and Hall-of-Fame voters.

And that's a shame. Adolf Frederick "Swede" Youngstrom deserves more, much more, than that.