How short is too short for the Pro Football Hall of Fame, and how elite is elite? OK, let's try putting those two ideas together and asking the question another way: Can a player with a short career be considered great enough to be enshrined in Canton?
I think you know the answer.
Look at Chicago's Gale Sayers. He's the classic example of the post-two-way era. His seven-year career was long enough because for five of them he was a phenom ... making first-team All-Pro every year and wowing fans like few had before.
Or since.
But Sayers was the seven-season exception ... until 2017, that is. Then along came Kenny Easley, Terrell Davis, Tony Boselli and this year's seniors' inductee, Sterling Sharpe. So, if seven years is acceptable for those guys, why not for former defensive lineman and linebacker Rich "Tombstone" Jackson? He wasn't the five-time All-Pro like the "Kansas Comet," but he does seem comparable to others in terms of peak performance.
Let me explain.
Jackson was called one of the two best defensive ends Sports Illustrated's Paul Zimmerman ever saw. The other was Deacon Jones. But the former Hall-of-Fame voter never could get Jackson's name included in a serious discussion for Canton, mostly because of longevity. He didn't have it.
That didn't matter to "Dr. Z," who was all about quality over quantity. If he was considering two candidates, and one was better than the other -- even though he played fewer seasons and games -- he'd choose him. As I said, he always leaned on the side of quality. However, he wasn't persuasive enough with Jackson. He was never a Hall-of-Fame finalist or semifinalist.
But with the recent inductions of finalists with short careers, maybe he was on to something. When two candidates are close, maybe quality IS better than quantity. And what Zimmerman saw in Rich Jackson was a dominant defensive end who frightened and beat up offensive tackles.
At his peak, there were no better defensive ends in the NFL. He was an elite pass rusher who could go around or through blockers. But he was more than a one-trick pony. He was a force in the run game, too, acting more like a blocker than a tackler. Instead of absorbing blocks and trying to fight them off, he put his shoulder under an opposing lineman's pads and drove him backward ... off the line of scrimmage.
Essentially, his object was to win the collision, and he could -- often hurting his opponent.
"I would run-block the run blockers, if you know what I mean," said the Southern University grad. "What they were trying to do to me, I just got there quicker and lower."
As the Broncos' enforcer, Jackson filled an additional role on defense. His job was to teach lessons to offensive linemen guilty of frequent fouls, especially holding. When Lyle Alzado was a rookie with Denver, for instance, a tackle tried "trash-talking" him until Alzado complained to "Tombstone." So the two switched positions, and, according to Alzado, Jackson "knocked the guy out. Head slap. All I heard was pow! And this guy was on the ground."
Then there was the time Jackson went mano-a-mano with Hall-of-Fame tackle Bob Brown.
"Rich just devastated the guy," said Alzado, who described Jackson as the toughest man he ever met. "Rich had his nose bleeding, knocked out his teeth, broke his helmet. I saw Rich knock guys to their knees with the head slap. Knocked them on their back."
Hard to believe, but he did this from a 245-250-pound frame. Though not huge by NFL standards, Jackson was strong. Legendarily strong. He may have had more natural strength than any defensive end ever, bench-pressing over 550 pounds. By almost all accounts, when healthy, Rich Jackson was a mismatch for all opponents. In fact, Hall-of-Fame quarterback Len Dawson said that when he thought of him, he thought of pain.
I don't care that his career was short. Neither should the Hall's seniors committee. After all, his three All-Pro seasons are the same as the other seven-season phenoms -- Boselli, Davis, Easley and Sterling Sharpe. But Jackson was also on the AFL's All-Time team. He was also voted his league or conference's defensive lineman of the year in 1969 and 1970.
According to Broncos' gamebooks, in his three All-Pro seasons, "Tombstone" averaged 90 tackles, 11 sacks, seven passes defensed and two forced fumbles. He ended his career with 45 sacks, and while that total is not prodigious, remember this: He was the individual opponents targeted on the Denver defense, often assigning a tight end or running back to assist tackles who couldn't block him.
Unfortunately, the Broncos of Jackson's era (1967-71) were not winners. He had winning seasons only in his first and last pro seasons, and they weren't with Denver. They were with the 1966 Raiders and the 1972 Browns..
Maybe that backed off voters, I don't know. But times have changed, and voters should, too. A star player who is in the Black College Football Hall of Fame, the Greater New Orleans Sports Hall of Fame and the Louisiana Sports Hall of Fame deserves a shot to be in the ultimate Hall of Fame -- the one in Canton, Ohio.
Anyone with a peak like Rich Jackson's must be considered.
I always thought Dr. Z must have been [a Mile] high in his HOF support for Rich Jackson. If you look at Jackson's 7 years, how many of those were truly HOF caliber seasons? Probably 3, maybe 4 if you're being generous. And how does that compare with the zillions of other D-linemen who don't get a sniff of the HOF who also had 3 or 4-year runs of greatness - or longer? Just from the 1970s, Sherk, Reid, Stanfill, Fernandez, Chambers, Hardman, Hart, Gregory, Dutton, Barnes, Greenwood, White, Holmes, Cline, Alzado, Brooks, Dryer, G.Johnson, Kelcher, Baker, Too Tall, Martin come to mind immediately, then you have longer-career types like Marshall, Pugh, McGee who were stalwarts on consistently winning teams. I don't get how Tombstone's 3 or 4-year run could be considered markedly different than those aforementioned players, or lots of others who I'm sure other readers could mention.
ReplyDeleteThe whole "short career" topic always comes up for NFL HOF. And I know this is an art, not a science, but I think some kind of standard of "number of HOF-quality years" for each position would make sense. QBs would need more seasons than RBs, as the realistic prime years of their position are longer. For RBs, would 4 seasons (Terrell Davis) or 5 seasons (Gale Sayers) be enough, in which case Larry Brown, Chuck Foreman, Lawrence McCutcheon and some others should probably be in. For DEs, I think it has to more than 4 seasons, and I would even skew it to be more like 7 or 8 years, or the Hall will be diluted to a point of no value.
Personally, I don't think any team sport HOF should have inductions for individuals. It's too hard to sort out the relative impacts of individuals in a team sport. If I created the Pro Football HOF, it would be all about teams as a whole. There would be three sections honoring the following categories of teams 1) a section for the champions of each season, 2) the runners-up (championship or Super Bowl losers) of each season, and 3) one team from each season that was memorable for one reason or another. This section would spark some good debates. For instance the "wild card" entries in the Hall of Fame for the 1970s could be the 1970 "Shula turns it around" Dolphins, the 1971 "the Future is Now" Redskins, the 1972 "Immaculate Reception" Steelers, the 1973 "OJ for the record" Bills, the 1974 Hart-Metcalf-Gray Cardinals, the 1975 "Miracle on 33rd Street" Colts, the 1976 Steelers with their legendary defensive run, the 1977 Grits Blitz Falcons, the 1978 Luv Ya Blue Oilers, the 1979 Buccaneers, etc.
BW ...
DeleteGood reply, but I feel the HOF is more about commemorating winning for teams, through individual elections, than just great individual play or dominance. Based on play alone, Lynn Swann might not have gotten elected, but combined with clutch play and being instrumental in his team winning games and championships, it gets him elected. Like you mentioned, possibly too much subjectivity towards electing players, with others left out in the cold, but teams remembered for winning, will produce that.
Tombstone Jackson was a great player on a bad team, and wasnt evaluated properly by the Raiders. Imagine if he could have replaced Ben Davidson or the team had Lassiter replace Davidson, with Jackson rushing from the defensive left side? They may have beaten the Jets, Chiefs or Colts in those huge games.
great post.
ReplyDeleteI wish there is some kind of All Half-Decade ranking to determine which players at their short peak is the best against their peers, since All (Full)-Decade eliminates those outstanding individuals who couldn't sustain their otherworldly performance longer for one reason or another.
for fun I did this 8-9 years ago ... I put Jackson 3rd behind Jones and Eller
Delete